LiteON vs LG

Apr 28,2005 0

6. DAE Tests

Review Pages

1. LG GDR8163B
2. LiteOn SOHD-16P9S
3. Transfer Rate Reading Tests
4. CD Error Correction Tests
5. DVD Error Correction Tests
6. DAE Tests
7. Protected AudioCDs
8. Protected Disc Tests
9. Quality Scans
10. Hacked Firmware for LG
11. Hacked Firmware for LiteOn
12. Conclusion

- Pressed and CDR AudioCD results

The LG supports a maximum 52X DAE speed while the LiteOn 48X.

The LiteOn drive was more consistent with both media types while the LG although fastest with the pressed CD, lost a good deal in speed when reading CD-R media.

EAC also reported the following information for each drive:

LG
LiteOn

- Advanced DAE Quality

All tested drives received a perfect quality score of 100. The LiteOn was the fastest.

Advanced DAE Quality for LG

Advanced DAE Quality for LiteOn

- Ripping 90mins AudioCDs

LiteOn

- Ripping 99mins AudioCDs

LiteOn

The LG drive managed to read only the 99min test disc while LiteOn failed in both tests.

Review Pages

LG Electronics

LiteOn

0 Comments

Your name

Subject

Comment *

More information about text formats

Text format

Filtered HTML

Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

No HTML tags allowed.
Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

BBCode

No HTML tags allowed.
You may use these tags: [abbr], [acronym], [b], [center], [code], [color], [define], [font], [h1], [h2], [h3], [h4], [h5], [h6], [hr], [i], [img], [justify], [left], [list], [node], [php], [quote], [right], [s], [size], [sub], [sup], [u], [url], [wikipedia], [youtube], [align], [link], [ol], [ul]
Lines and paragraphs break automatically.