Friday, December 09, 2016
Search
  
Most Popular
Hardware Reviews
PC Parts
Shuttle XPC Slim DS67U Barebone
Kingston DC400 960GB SSD review
Toshiba OCZ RD400 512GB M.2 PCIe SSD
Minix Neo Z83-4 Windows Mini PC review
Shuttle DH110 review
WEB Reviews
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 V.3 4TB SAS 6Gb/s HDD Review
OCZ Vector 256GB SSD Review @ Custom PC Review
Gigabyte F2A85XM-D3H
NZXT Phantom 630
Auvio Bluetooth Portable Speaker Review
Corsair H90 CPU Cooler Review
BIOSTAR Hi-Fi Z77X (Intel Z77) Motherboard Review
Noctua NH-L9i Cooler Review on Technic3D
Breaking News
Samsung To Make Chips For Tesla Cars
Google Opens its Digital Assistant to Developers
BlackBerry Unveils BlackBerry Secure For IoT Mobile Security
ARM Physical IP for TSMC 7nm Process Technology Now Available
HTC Launches Vive Studios, Debuts "Arcade Saga" Title
Radeon Software Crimson ReLive Edition Brings Support For Chill, Along With New Features
Microsoft Unveils Windows 10 for Qualcomm Chips, "Project Evo" PCs For Mixed Reality And Gaming
Samsung's First Foldable Phone May Actually Not Have A Foldable Screen
Home > Hardware Reviews > PC Parts

Tuesday, November 12, 2013
Kingston DataTraveler HyperX 3 64GB

3. Benchmarks

We ran the benchmarks on the following PC:

  • Intel i5-2500K with default cooler
  • Gigabyte Z77X-D3H with the latest available bios
  • 4x2GB Kingston 2133MHz HyperX rated memories
  • Seagate 7200.12 500GB 7200rpm
  • Windows 7 x64 SP1 with all latest updated installed

The Kingston DataTraveler HyperX 3 64GB comes pre-formatted (FAT32) and offers 58.8GB of free storage:.

We used the latest CrystalDiskMark 3.0.2 to get an idea of the drive's sequential speeds. While the drives' specs rate this drive at 225MB/sec reading, 135MB/sec writing, the CrystalDiskMark gave higher speeds at both tests. The 512K/4K/4K QD32 writing speeds were somewhat low, as it typically happens with most USB flash drives:

The 0-fill test returned lower performance in all the tests.

Passing to the AS SSD Benchmark, we confirmed the sequential reading/writing speeds of the flash drive. But the 4K/4K-64Thrd scores remained very low, meaning you'll have to wait more when you are dealing with small files.

Below you see the drive's reading and writing performance with files partially or fully compressed:

The ATTO Disk Benchmark confirmed the drive;s slow performance with small files. The drive's performance peaked with 64KB and 128KB files:




Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message


 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2016 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .