Wednesday, October 18, 2017
Search
  
Most Popular
Hardware Reviews
PC Parts
Intel Core i9-7980XE and Core i9-7960X benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700K and Core i5-8400 benchmarks
WEB Reviews
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 V.3 4TB SAS 6Gb/s HDD Review
OCZ Vector 256GB SSD Review @ Custom PC Review
Gigabyte F2A85XM-D3H
NZXT Phantom 630
Auvio Bluetooth Portable Speaker Review
Corsair H90 CPU Cooler Review
BIOSTAR Hi-Fi Z77X (Intel Z77) Motherboard Review
Noctua NH-L9i Cooler Review on Technic3D
Breaking News
Intel Advances Artificial Intelligence With Nervana Neural Network Processor
Razer Launches Quad-core Blade Stealth Laptop and Core V2 External Graphics Enclosure
Google Designed New Pixel Visual Core Chip Internally
The ZTE Axon M is the First Foldable Smartphone
New Microsoft Surface Book 2 Packs Real Power, Windows 10 Creators Update Release
NXP S32 Automotive Processing Platform Brings Future Vehicles to Market Faster
Google's Advanced Protection Program Adds Security Layers to Gmail
Qualcomm Debuts Snapdragon 636 Mobile Platform, X50 5G Modem For Mobiles
Home > Hardware Reviews > PC Parts

Thursday, December 06, 2012
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB review

5. CrystalDiskMark

The next benchmark is the CrystalDiskMark. The software provides throughput data based on sequential reads and writes, and random (512K/4K/4KQD32) reads and writes of various sizes.

Below you see the drive;s performance with compressible data:

As we previously saw, the SSDNow V300 120GB SSD will perform according to its official specs in the sequential reading and writing tasks. The drive reads smaller random files a little bit slower than the competition, especially as queue depths increases:

 

 




Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message


 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2017 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .