Thursday, September 09, 2010
Search
  
Most Popular
Hardware Reviews
Optical Storage
LiteOn iHBS112 review
WEB Reviews
AC Ryan PlayOn!HD
Arctic MX-4 Thermal Compound
ASUS ROG Rampage III Extreme (X58 Express) Motherboard
ASUS VH232H 23-inch 1080p LCD Monitor
BeQuiet! SilentWings USC und Pure Fan Series
Danger Den DD-GTX470 GPU Water Block
GIGABYTE 870A-UD3 Motherboard
Kodak Zi8 Pocket HD Video Camera
Breaking News
Adobe Highlights Video Innovations at IBC 2010
Apple iOS 4 Update Adds Social Features, HDR Photography
LaCie Introduces the Compact Mobile and Desktop USB 3.0 Hard Drives
Fujitsu MB86E50 Controller Delivers Optimal Performance for USB 3.0-SATA RAID External Storage Applications
Google Speeds Up Searching
ARM Unveils Cortex-A15 MPCore Processor For Mobiles, Small Servers
Matrox Introduces Direct Capture to H.264 Video Files for the Web, iPad, iPhone, and YouTube
Special Edition Xbox 360 250GB with Kinect Available In November
Home > Hardware Reviews > Optical Storage

Friday, June 19, 2009
Blu-Ray Writing Quality Tests Vol 2

26. Final thoughts

The results were disappointing for almost all the discs. As you can see in the table below, both the LDC and BIS signals were well above the acceptable limits. Only the Verbatim BD-R 2x 7.5GB disc reported good results with the Pioneer BD burner, followed by the TDK BD-R 4X 25GB burned at 8x with the same drive and the Moser Baer India BD-R 6X 25GB burned at 6x with the Sony drive:

BD Disc
Write speed
Burner
Average LDC (upper limit 13)
Average BIS (upper limit 15)
Panasonic BD-R 6X 50GB MEIRB1 (001)
8X
Pioneer BDR-203BK v1.10
105.90
1.58
Verbatim BD-R 2X 50GB VERBATIMb (000)
2X
58.19
0.79
TDK BD-R 6X 50GB TDKBLDRFD (000)
8X
105.3
43
Moser Baer India BD-R 6X 25GB MBIR06 (000)
8X
94.61
1.94
Panasonic BD-R 6X 25GB MEIRA1 (001)
8X
121.22
2.47
TDK BD-R 4X 25GB TDKBLDRBB (000)
8X
27.12
0.36
TDK BD-R 6X 25GB TDKBLDRBD
8X
660.94
14.26
Verbatim BD-R 4X 25GB VERBATIMc (000)
8X
41.55
0.64
Verbatim BD-R 6X 25GB VERBATIMe (000)
8X
251.57
6.19
Verbatim BD-R LTH 2X 25GB VERBATIMw (000)
2X
70.33
1.19
Verbatim BD-RE 2X 7.5GB VERBATIM0 (000)
2x
73.12
1.38
Verbatim BD-RE 2X 25GB VERBATIM0 (000)
2X
58.04
1.10
TDK BD-RE 2X 50GB TDKBLDWfa (000)
2X
162.35
3.36
Verbatim BD-R 2x 7.5GB VERBATIMa (000)
2X
11.64
0.23
Panasonic BD-R 6X 50GB MEIRB1 (001)
8X
Sony BWU-300S v1.06
72.05
1.67
Verbatim BD-R 2X 50GB VERBATIMb (000)
2X
55.36
0.91
Moser Baer India BD-R 6X 25GB MBIR06 (000)
6X
24.78
0.58
Panasonic BD-R 6X 25GB MEIRA1 (001)
8X
79.79
1.74
Verbatim BD-R 6X 25GB VERBATIMe (000)
6X
251.57
6.19
Verbatim BD-R 4X 25GB VERBATIMc (000)
4X
67.90
1.30
Verbatim BD-R LTH 2X 25GB VERBATIMw (000)
2X
388.67
4.81
Verbatim BD-RE 2X 25GB VERBATIM0 (000)
2X
58.04
1.10
Verbatim BD-RE 2X 7.5GB VERBATIM0 (000)
2X
207.31
4.11

When you are dealing with complicated measurements such as those required for checking the quality of the Blu-ray discs, it would be wise to avoid any bold statements and conclusions. That because our tests were performed using equipment that was actually a home brew PC system and the BD-ROM reader/software, which are always lack accuracy and repeatability. In addition, consider that you cannot ensure that the surface of each disc is completely free of any microscopic particles microscopic such as dust or smoke when you make a measurement.

For all the discs, the Long Distance Code (LDC) values were higher than the Burst Indicator Subcode (BIS), which is normal since the first is related to the error correction code added in each data sector to protect the main data and the latter is actually protecting the pickets, which are columns that are inserted in between columns of the main data at regular intervals and works as a burst indicator mechanism that can detect bursts of errors.

So what could have caused these 'bad' results?

  • Not reliable software/reader
  • Insufficiently cleaned discs
  • Poor writing strategy of the BD burners for each speed, especially for the 6x and 8x
  • Low media quality

It 's really hard to come up with any conclusions just from a single test. But it would be safe to say that disc we used for the test were brand new and their quality must be adequate if not high. In addition, all the discs were carefully cleaned and looked in perfect shape with naked eye before testing. But is the 8x burning speed very high for the disc found on the stores today? Soon we will be able to test the same discs using more reliable equipment.

On the other hand, testing the discs 'out of the box' after cleaning them is closer to the scenario of a consumer using a Blu-ray recordable disc for backups of data or video. Despite the many errors reported for each disc, none of them caused any problems to our BD readers and they were fully readable, which is quite encouraging.




Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message


Recommended Links
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2010 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .