Friday, November 20, 2009
Search
  
Most Popular
Hardware Reviews
General Computing
WEB Reviews
Sapphire HD 5750 1 GB GDDR5
Synology DS209 Advance NAS Enclosures
Toshiba Satellite T135 Win 7 CULV Notebook
ASRock M3A785GXH/128M Motherboard
LiteON iHAS424 Dual-Layer DVD Writer
Sapphire PurePSU 950W
AMD Athlon II X3 435 Triple Core Processor
Cooler Master Lab Test Bench V1.0
Breaking News
Twitter To Charge For Upcoming Services
YouTube More Acessible With Automatic Captions Feature
Panasonic Presents Advanced Disc for Archive
ASUS Supercharges The Eee Line Of PCs With NVIDIA ION
MediaTek and Qualcomm Enter Into Patent Arrangement
Intel Validates Hynix 40nm Class 2Gb DDR3 Products
Elpida Completes Development of 1-Gigabit GDDR5
PlayStation Network Video Delivery Service Now Available for Europe
Home > Hardware Reviews > General Computing

Tuesday, January 10, 2006
SATA vs SATA II

2. HD Tach

In order to test and gauge the performance of SATA II, we compared it with SATA 1.0. Both discs were Western Digital, connected to the motherboard's SATA.

HD Tach tests the sequential read, random access and interface burst speeds of your attached storage device (hard drive, flash drive, removable drive, etc). All drive technologies such as SCSI, IDE/ATA, 1394, USB, SATA and RAID are supported. Test results from HD Tach can be used to confirm manufacturer specs, analyze systems for proper performance and compare your performance with others.

This benchmark is intended to determine the maximum read or write speed on the device at various locations. Hard drives, for example, have faster read/write speeds at the inside edge (mapped to block 0) of the device, so it is useful to see the difference in speed. The maximum sustained speed (lowest speed on the device) is an important metric for real time sequential access applications. The maximum speed may be important to a power user that would like to partition the drive into a high speed partition and low speed partition.

Shown in red above, is the WD2500JS (SATA II).
Alternatively in blue, we have the performance of the WD3000JD (SATA).

As we can see from the graph, performance with the WD2500JS is slightly better, starting off with a sequential read speed of 63MB/s and tapering off to around 35MB/s towards the end. While performance with the WD3000JD started at 53MB/s and maintained the transfer rate at around 35MB/s toward the end.

In the overall averages, for reading tests, the WD2500JS reported 52.9MB/s and the WD3000JD 53.3MB/s, whilst in writing, 45.3MB/s and 47.0MB/s respectively. The difference between them isn't significant and this difference is due to the different supported transfer rates (300MB/s for the WDC WD 2500JS and 150MB/s for the WDC WD 3000JD).




Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message


Recommended Links
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2009 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .