Saturday, December 10, 2016
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
U.S. Confirms Samsung and LG Dumped Washers
Xiaomi Electric Vehicle Launch on Monday, Yeelight LED Ceiling Light Launched
Hon Hai, Sharp To Build Massive LCD TV Plant In China
U.S. To Review Cyber Attacks Beyond 2016 Election
Samsung To Brick Remaining Note7 Device Through Software Update
Samsung SDI to Supply Batteries To Lucid Motors
Samsung To Design And Make Chips For Tesla Cars
Google Opens its Digital Assistant to Developers
Active Discussions
Which of these DVD media are the best, most durable?
How to back up a PS2 DL game
Copy a protected DVD?
roxio issues with xp pro
Help make DVDInfoPro better with dvdinfomantis!!!
menu making
Optiarc AD-7260S review
cdrw trouble
 Home > News > PC Parts > Apple P...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Friday, October 26, 2012
Apple Posts Online 'Samsung did not copy' Statement


Following a UK court's decision to force Apple into publicly acknowledging that Samsung did not copy its design, Apple has posted online the statement.

"On 9th July 2012 the High Court of Justice of England and Wales ruled that Samsung Electronic (UK) Limited's Galaxy Tablet Computer, namely the Galaxy Tab 10.1, Tab 8.9 and Tab 7.7 do not infringe Apple's registered design No. 0000181607-0001," reads Apple's online post, adding a link to a copy of the full judgment.

Apple also pointed out the positive comments Judge Colin Birss made about its own slates. In the ruling, the judge made points comparing the designs of the Apple and Samsung products:

"The extreme simplicity of the Apple design is striking. Overall it has undecorated flat surfaces with a plate of glass on the front all the way out to a very thin rim and a blank back. There is a crisp edge around the rim and a combination of curves, both at the corners and the sides. The design looks like an object the informed user would want to pick up and hold. It is an understated, smooth and simple product. It is a cool design."

"The informed user's overall impression of each of the Samsung Galaxy Tablets is the following. From the front they belong to the family which includes the Apple design; but the Samsung products are very thin, almost insubstantial members of that family with unusual details on the back. They do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design. They are not as cool."

Apple noted that the Judgment has effect throughout the European Union and was upheld by the Court of Appeal on 18 October 2012.

Apple added that in a case tried in Germany regarding the same patent, the court found that Samsung engaged in unfair competition by copying the iPad design. A U.S. jury also found Samsung guilty of infringing on Apple's design and utility patents, awarding over one billion U.S. dollars in damages to Apple.


Previous
Next
Samsung Maintains Leadership Position In Smartphone Market        All News        Apple Reports Record Fourth Quarter Revenue and Profit
Panasonic Introduces the Toughbook C2 Windows 8 Convertible Tablet     PC Parts News      AMD Set To Announce ARM-based Server on Monday

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
Samsung To Brick Remaining Note7 Device Through Software Update
Samsung SDI to Supply Batteries To Lucid Motors
Samsung To Design And Make Chips For Tesla Cars
Samsung's First Foldable Phone May Actually Not Have A Foldable Screen
Apple In Talks With Hollywood For Early Movie Rental
These Are Apple's Best of 2016 Across Apps, Music, And Movies
Western Digital Renews Patent Cross-License Agreement with Samsung
U.S. Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Samsung in Smartphone Patent Suit
KAIST Sues Samsung, Qualcomm And Globalfoundries Over FinFET Patent Infringement
Samsung Offers Second Gear S2 Update
Apple Sent Letter NHTSA Asking About Autonomous Vehicle Guidelines
Apple Blames Battery For Random iPhone 6s Shutdowns

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2016 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .