Wednesday, August 23, 2017
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
GPU Shipments Increased from Previous Quarter
LG to Establish Factory for Electric Vehicle Components in the U.S.
Microsoft Unveils Project Brainwave for Real-time AI
Panasonic Touts 1TB Optical Disc For Storing Cold Data
Google to Detail Titan Security Chip for Cloud Services
Toshiba Puts Weight in Talks With Western Digital on Chips Business Sale
Micron Expands its NVDIMM-N Portfolio
Verizon Raises Prices, Limits Video Quality on Unlimited Plans
Active Discussions
Which of these DVD media are the best, most durable?
How to back up a PS2 DL game
Copy a protected DVD?
roxio issues with xp pro
Help make DVDInfoPro better with dvdinfomantis!!!
menu making
Optiarc AD-7260S review
cdrw trouble
 Home > News > General Computing > U.S. Co...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Friday, September 02, 2011
U.S. Court Rejects Oracle Verdict Against SAP


A U.S. judge discarded Oracle's $1.3 billion jury verdict against SAP AG, paving the way for a possible new trial in the years-long dispute.

In a ruling released on Thursday, U.S. District Judge Phyllis Hamilton called the $1.3 billion copyright infringement verdict against SAP "grossly excessive."

Oracle had proven actual damages of only $272 million, the Judge said, who called for a new trial unless Oracle agreed to accept that amount.

"The court finds further that the award of hypothetical license damages totaling $1.3 billion was contrary to the weight of the evidence, and was grossly excessive. Given SAP's concession of liability, and request for a remittitur, the court GRANTS the motion for a new trial as to actual damages, conditioned on Oracle?s rejection of a remittitur to $272 million. Should Oracle reject the remittitur, the court will order a new trial as to actual damages in the form of lost profits/infringer?s profits only. The court DENIES Oracle's "conditional motion" for a new trial," a court's document reads.

Oracle filed suit against SAP in March 2007, alleging copyright infringement, violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, and various state-law claims. After more than three and a half years of heated litigation, the case was tried to a jury in November 2010. Prior to the trial, SAP conceded liability as to all claims that had not previously been dismissed. Thus, the only issue for decision by the jury was the amount of the damages. On November 23, 2011, the jury returned a verdict, awarding Oracle $1.3 billion in "hypothetical license" damages.

Oracle can either accept the $272 million figure, ask for a new trial, or appeal Hamilton's ruling. SAP could also appeal the $272 million figure.


Previous
Next
Researchers Develop Optical Film For Glasses-free 3D Displays        All News        Haier Showcases The First Brain Computer Interface Smart TV at IFA
Researchers Develop Optical Film For Glasses-free 3D Displays     General Computing News      Hulu Launches in Japan

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
European Commission Fines Facebook €110 Million for Providing Misleading Information About WhatsApp Takeover
Fujitsu and Oracle Launch Fujitsu SPARC M12 Servers with Fastest Per-Core Performance
WhatsApp Adds Secure Video Calling
Facebook Won't Use Whatsapp Data Amid Privacy Probe
EU Privacy Authorities Warn WhatsApp on Data Privacy Policy, Yahoo on Breach
WhatsApp Privacy Changes Raise EU Concern
Facebook To Use Personal Data From WhatsApp To Bring You Personalized Ads
Oracle to Buy NetSuite for $9.3 Billion
Fujitsu and Oracle Team Up to Drive Cloud Computing
Oracle To Pay HP $3 billion In Itanium Case
Google Wins Oracle in Android Trial
Apple and SAP to Develop Business Apps For iPhone And iPad

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2017 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .