Monday, May 20, 2013
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
Next-generation Xbox Coming Tomorrow
Marvell Unveils Quad-core 5-mode Category 4 LTE Single-chip Solution
Seagate Delivers First 4TB Video Hard Disk Drive
Jolla Introduces First Sailfish-based Smartphone
Yahoo Acquires Tumblr
PCMark 8 Benchmark Announced
Sony Xperia Tablet Z Noe Available Worldwide
Sharp IGZO-based LCD and OLED Displays on Show at Display Week 2013
Active Discussions
CDR for car Sat Nav
deleted
CD Drive Retrieve
burning
Extremely Slow External CD (Samsung SE-S084C)
Best optical drive for ripping CD's? My LG 4163B is mediocre.
Verbatim DVD+R still tops?
Doubt in choosing an Optiarc writer
 Home > News > PC Parts > Intel C...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Thursday, November 06, 2008
Intel Core i7 Nehalem Processors Launch on November 17


Intel provided information about its next-generation micro-architecture (Nehalem) with the Core i7 processors at a media event on Wednesday in Athens, Greece, prior to the worldwide official release of the system on November 17.

The two major characteristics of the new i7 architecture are the triple-channel integrated memory controllers and the new interface called Quick Path Interconnect (QPI). Other highlights include the monolithic die to consolidate all four cores in a single piece of silicon, and the shared L3 cache. Further improvements include the use of the Hyper-threading as well as the Turbo Boost technologies. The Core i7 processors are also optimized to operate with Intel's X58 chipset.

The Corei7 series will feature three quad-core models: The 2.66 GHz Core i7 920 will aim for the sub-$1000 class of PCs, the 2.93 GHz Core i7 940 for more expensive PCs in the $1500-$2000 range and the 3.2 GHz 965 Extreme Edition at enthusiast PCs.

The prices (1K pieces) of these CPUs are $999 for the Extreme Edition, $562 for the 940 and $284 for the 920.



The X58 Express chipset covers both the northbridge/southbridge operations. The X58 IOH supports up to 36 PCIe 2.0 lanes. Depending on the processor model, QPI may run at either 6.4 GT/sec (Core i7-965) or 6.4 GT/sec (Core i7-940, i7-920) to communicate with the X58 Express chipset in each direction. This is twice the bandwidth of Intel's currently available X48 chipset, plus the full-duplex transport instead of the half-duplex. AMD's HyperTransport 3.0 still has an advantage herewith up to 41.6GB/s of bi-directional bandwidth.

However, the X58 Express does not support the legacy PS/2 IDE, serial or parallel ports.

Turbo mode

Under the "TurboMode", the utilization of the number of active cores is used to adjust the frequency. For example, if only two cores are active, then there will be much more headroom within the thermal and power envelope and the CPU will be clocked higher. So the "turbo" frequencies of each core depend on the number of cores active. We could say that this is mainly a power saving feature.

Turbo Mode boasts single threaded applications as well as the performance of multi-threaded applications, according to Intel. Below is a graph that Intel showed with the Core i7 Extreme CPU to process in single-core and quad-core configurations, with Turbo Mode enabled. The graph shows the percent performance increase with Turbo Mode enabled.


Benchmarks and performance

Intel also gave live demonstrations of the Core i7 system using various benchmarks. The company compared two systems powered by Intel's currently available high-end Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and the new Core i7 Extreme 965 processors:

Core i7 vs. Core 2 Quad
Centrino platform
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Core i7 Extreme 965
CPU
Core 2 Extreme QX9770 @ 3.2 GHz
Core i7 Extreme 965 @ 3.2GHz
Chipset
X48
X58
Memory
Kingston 2GB DDR2-1066 (1x2GB)
Kingston 2GB DDR3-1066 (1x2GB)
Graphics
ATI 4850
ATI 4850
HDD
SATA 120GB 5.4K2.5"
SATA 120GB 5.4K2.5"

According to Sisoft Sandra memory bandwidth benchmark, the Core i7 Extreme 965 was faster by the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 by 2.3x.

The latency of the CPU cores was 42nsec for the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and just 14nsec for the new Core i7 Extreme 965.

In Maxon Cinebench graphics rendering application, the Core i7 Extreme 965 required 25% less time than the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 to finish the same task.

Intel also fired up Valve's Value Particle benchmark and monitored the produced FPS form each system, while rendering the same scene. The performance gain of the Core i7 Extreme 965 was 15 FPS on average.

In general, Intel concluded that the new Core i7 CPUs can offer 50% higher performance than the existing CPUs.

Future roadmaps

Intel also provided some information about the future desktop platforms. In the Q3 of 2009, the company will release the Lynnfield platform, which includes the i7 CPUs and the P55 and G55 chipsets. Compared to today's three-chip solution, (CPU, chipset, I/O), Lynnfield will be a 2-chip solution, with the graphics to move into the ibex Peak chipset:

The next step is the introduction of the Havendale platform, where the graphics migrate into the CPU itself.



Previous
Next
Shuttle Announces HD-compatible AMD-based Mini-PC System        All News        Yahoo Looks at Microsoft As Google Walks Away From Ad Deal
Shuttle Announces HD-compatible AMD-based Mini-PC System     PC Parts News      Asus Details New EE Top PC

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
Intel Releases New Android Developer Environment
Intel Loses Some Ground Over Samsung In Semiconductor Sales
Haswell's Integrated Voltage Regulator Detailed
Intel Acquires SOftware Companies Aepona, Mashery
Intel Sees Challenges In Keeping Up With Moore's Law
Intel Launches Low-Power Silvermont Microarchitecture
New CEO For Intel
Intel Details Its Next-generation 'Iris' Graphics Chips
Samsung And Intel Invest In Siri Alternative
4th Generation Intel Core Processors Coming At Computex
Intel Adds 80GB Model To Solid-State Drive 335 Series
Etisalat E-20 With Intel Inside Launches In Egypt

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2013 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .