Monday, April 23, 2018
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
Samsung Launches Six Original Series on Samsung VR Video Service on Gear VR
Facebook Says Users Are Not Products, the Social Network Is
European Regulators Investigate Apple's Proposed Acquisition of Shazam
Amazon is Working on Home Robots: report
7nm Volume Production to Fuel TSMC's Profits This Year
Toshiba Weighs Memory Chip Unit Options
Google Chat Launches to compete with Apple's iMessage
ASUS ZenFone Max Pro M1 Brings Great Value Priced at Just $165
Active Discussions
Which of these DVD media are the best, most durable?
How to back up a PS2 DL game
Copy a protected DVD?
roxio issues with xp pro
Help make DVDInfoPro better with dvdinfomantis!!!
menu making
Optiarc AD-7260S review
cdrw trouble
 Home > News > PC Parts > Intel Y...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Monday, December 24, 2007
Intel Yorkfield Chip Delay Due To Board Issues


Some motherboards slated to use quad-core Yorkfield processors are saddled with compatibility issues that may result in delays.

This, according to a report on the x86watch web site. The motherboards in question use Intel's upcoming 45-nanometer Q9550, Q9450, and Q9300 processors (otherwise referred to as Yorkfield non-Extreme).

An Intel spokesperson responded: "The 45nm Core 2 Quad launch is planned for Q1'08, and we are still on track for that." Rumors have been circulating that Intel is delaying Yorkfield non-Extreme processors strictly because, some theorize, competition from AMD has dwindled--due to quad-core Phenom and Barcelona delays--to the point that Intel saw no compelling reason to bring out new desktop processors.

Actually, there appears to be a more practical reason behind the delay, according to reports. Sources at Taiwan motherboard manufacturers are citing problems with the front-side bus (FSB) on certain boards that would use the Yorkfield non-Extreme processors. More specifically, mass-market four-layer boards, such as some P35-based boards, may have "noise" and stability issues, according to PC Watch which cited Taiwan motherboard vendors.

High-end, six-layer boards, such as those that use the X38 chipset, do not appear to have any FSB issues, according to the report. Consequently, high-end (six-layer) boards based on Intel's Extreme QX9650 do not have the issue, but lower-end boards using upcoming Yorkfield non-Extreme chips could potentially have issues. Apparently, Harpertown and dual-core Wolfdale boards do not have issues.

Finally, what rumors and reports seem to be missing is that Intel is not necessarily intentionally delaying these processors only because it believes that AMD is not competitive. The more plausible reason is that Intel believes that it has breathing room to fix the issue because of the AMD Barcelona and Phenom delays. The Intel fix may take one to two months, according to reports.

From x86watch web site



Previous
Next
AMD Phenom CPUs to See Further Delays        All News        Apple to go Intel with Handheld Devices
AMD Phenom CPUs to See Further Delays     PC Parts News      Samsung, Hitachi Sign Cross-licensing Aggreement on Hard Drives

Source Link Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
Intel Open Sources the nGraph Compiler for Deep Learning Systems
Intel Adds Security Features To The Core
Intel Core i9 6-core Processor Comes to Mobile
Intel Under Pressure as Report Says Apple is Designing its Own Chips for Macs
Samsung and Fujitsu to Establish AI R&D Hubs in France
Intel and Facebook Unveil Next Generation OCP Twin Lakes 1S Server
Intel to Bring Hardware-based Protection to Data Center and PC Processors
Microsoft Uses AI to Match Human Performance in Translating News from Chinese to English
Buying Broadcom Could be an Option for Intel, If Qualcomm Deal Fail
Intel Releases Meltdown and Spectre fixes for Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge
Intel Optane SSD 800P Released
Intel Has Made a Server as Easy to Upgrade as a Light Bulb

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2018 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .