Monday, July 25, 2016
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
Verizon Buys Yahoo's Core Business For $4.83 billion
Microsoft slashes Surface Pro 4 and Xbox One Prices
Nintendo Downplays Pokemon GO's Earnings Impact
Half The World Remains Offline, ITU Study Found
Verizon Closer To Yahoo Deal
Lite-On Expands Its SSD Storage Manufacturing
Samsung Sues Huawei
Facebook's Aquila Maiden Flight Is A Reality
Active Discussions
Which of these DVD media are the best, most durable?
How to back up a PS2 DL game
Copy a protected DVD?
roxio issues with xp pro
Help make DVDInfoPro better with dvdinfomantis!!!
menu making
Optiarc AD-7260S review
cdrw trouble
 Home > News > PC Parts > Intel Y...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Monday, December 24, 2007
Intel Yorkfield Chip Delay Due To Board Issues


Some motherboards slated to use quad-core Yorkfield processors are saddled with compatibility issues that may result in delays.

This, according to a report on the x86watch web site. The motherboards in question use Intel's upcoming 45-nanometer Q9550, Q9450, and Q9300 processors (otherwise referred to as Yorkfield non-Extreme).

An Intel spokesperson responded: "The 45nm Core 2 Quad launch is planned for Q1'08, and we are still on track for that." Rumors have been circulating that Intel is delaying Yorkfield non-Extreme processors strictly because, some theorize, competition from AMD has dwindled--due to quad-core Phenom and Barcelona delays--to the point that Intel saw no compelling reason to bring out new desktop processors.

Actually, there appears to be a more practical reason behind the delay, according to reports. Sources at Taiwan motherboard manufacturers are citing problems with the front-side bus (FSB) on certain boards that would use the Yorkfield non-Extreme processors. More specifically, mass-market four-layer boards, such as some P35-based boards, may have "noise" and stability issues, according to PC Watch which cited Taiwan motherboard vendors.

High-end, six-layer boards, such as those that use the X38 chipset, do not appear to have any FSB issues, according to the report. Consequently, high-end (six-layer) boards based on Intel's Extreme QX9650 do not have the issue, but lower-end boards using upcoming Yorkfield non-Extreme chips could potentially have issues. Apparently, Harpertown and dual-core Wolfdale boards do not have issues.

Finally, what rumors and reports seem to be missing is that Intel is not necessarily intentionally delaying these processors only because it believes that AMD is not competitive. The more plausible reason is that Intel believes that it has breathing room to fix the issue because of the AMD Barcelona and Phenom delays. The Intel fix may take one to two months, according to reports.

From x86watch web site



Previous
Next
AMD Phenom CPUs to See Further Delays        All News        Apple to go Intel with Handheld Devices
AMD Phenom CPUs to See Further Delays     PC Parts News      Samsung, Hitachi Sign Cross-licensing Aggreement on Hard Drives

Source Link Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
Intel Kaby Lake Processors Coming Soon
Slow PC Market Keeps Hurting Intel
Project Malmo, Which Lets Researchers Use Minecraft for AI research, Makes Public Debut
BMW Group, Intel and Mobileye Team Up to Bring Autonomous Driving to Streets by 2021
Intel Could Sell Cyber-Security Unit
Intel Tries To Reverse $1.2 Billion Antitrust Fine at Top EU Court
Intel 72-core Xeon Phi Chip Challenges GPUs In Machine Learning Applications
iPhone 7 To Have Intel Chips Inside
Intel Custom Foundry Certifies Mentor Graphics Tools for 10nm Tri-Gate Process
New Intel Xeon Processor E7 v4 Family Delivers 24-core Horsepower For Real-Time Analytics
Computex: Intel Launches 10-core Core i7 Processor Extreme Edition And Xeon Processor E3-1500v5 Family
Sony Joins Forces with Cogitai to Conduct Research and Development for Artificial Intelligence

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2016 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .