Monday, May 30, 2016
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
Plextor To Showcase Its Gaming Grade SSDs at Computex 2016
Nvidia's GeForce GTX 1080 Launches Wordlwide
Corsair Bulldog PC Is Seeking A Place In Your Living Room
Samsung Galaxy C5 and C7 Released In China
SSD Adoption in Notebooks To Increase This Year As TLC NAND Market Matures
Samsung To Launch SamsungPay Mini Online Payments App
Facebook Publishers To Show Ads To Everyone
Samsung and Warner Bros. Release The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge Injustice Edition
Active Discussions
Which of these DVD media are the best, most durable?
How to back up a PS2 DL game
Copy a protected DVD?
roxio issues with xp pro
Help make DVDInfoPro better with dvdinfomantis!!!
menu making
Optiarc AD-7260S review
cdrw trouble
 Home > News > PC Parts > Intel Y...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Monday, December 24, 2007
Intel Yorkfield Chip Delay Due To Board Issues


Some motherboards slated to use quad-core Yorkfield processors are saddled with compatibility issues that may result in delays.

This, according to a report on the x86watch web site. The motherboards in question use Intel's upcoming 45-nanometer Q9550, Q9450, and Q9300 processors (otherwise referred to as Yorkfield non-Extreme).

An Intel spokesperson responded: "The 45nm Core 2 Quad launch is planned for Q1'08, and we are still on track for that." Rumors have been circulating that Intel is delaying Yorkfield non-Extreme processors strictly because, some theorize, competition from AMD has dwindled--due to quad-core Phenom and Barcelona delays--to the point that Intel saw no compelling reason to bring out new desktop processors.

Actually, there appears to be a more practical reason behind the delay, according to reports. Sources at Taiwan motherboard manufacturers are citing problems with the front-side bus (FSB) on certain boards that would use the Yorkfield non-Extreme processors. More specifically, mass-market four-layer boards, such as some P35-based boards, may have "noise" and stability issues, according to PC Watch which cited Taiwan motherboard vendors.

High-end, six-layer boards, such as those that use the X38 chipset, do not appear to have any FSB issues, according to the report. Consequently, high-end (six-layer) boards based on Intel's Extreme QX9650 do not have the issue, but lower-end boards using upcoming Yorkfield non-Extreme chips could potentially have issues. Apparently, Harpertown and dual-core Wolfdale boards do not have issues.

Finally, what rumors and reports seem to be missing is that Intel is not necessarily intentionally delaying these processors only because it believes that AMD is not competitive. The more plausible reason is that Intel believes that it has breathing room to fix the issue because of the AMD Barcelona and Phenom delays. The Intel fix may take one to two months, according to reports.

From x86watch web site



Previous
Next
AMD Phenom CPUs to See Further Delays        All News        Apple to go Intel with Handheld Devices
AMD Phenom CPUs to See Further Delays     PC Parts News      Samsung, Hitachi Sign Cross-licensing Aggreement on Hard Drives

Source Link Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
Sony Joins Forces with Cogitai to Conduct Research and Development for Artificial Intelligence
Brian Krzanich Outlines Intel's Future Strategy
Microsoft Positions Windows 10 As A Platform for the Intelligence Revolution
Intel To Axe 12,000 Jobs, Focuses On Cloud And Smart, Connected Computing Devicess
Intel Outlines Next Generation of Experiences At 2016 Intel Developers Forum Shenzhen
Intel Packs Altera Arria 10 FPGAs With Xeon E5-2600 v4 Processors
Intel Senior Executives Leaving Company
Intel Introduces Xeon Processor E5-2600 v4 And Its First 3D NAND SSDs
Chinese AI Team To Challenge Google's AlphaGo
Intel To Break From Typical Two-year CPU Release Cycle
New Intel NUC "Skull Canyon" Comes To Change the Game
Google Artificial Intelligence Program Wins Final Game In Go Tournament

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2016 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .