Wednesday, September 02, 2015
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
This Is Google's Redesigned Logo
Instagram Gets New Features
Alliance for Open Media To Deliver Open Standard for Online Ultra High Definition Video
Seagate Develops High Density Mobile Hard Drive Technology, New Portfolio of 8TB Hard Drives
Apple To Work With Cisco On Enterprise Environment; said To Prepare Own Original Programming
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 Processor To Geature Mobile Anti-malware Technology
WD My Cloud OS 3 Makes Cloud Storage More Personal
Samsung's Circular Gear S2 Smartwatches Unveiled
Active Discussions
How to back up a PS2 DL game
Copy a protected DVD?
roxio issues with xp pro
How to burn a backup copy of The Frozen Throne
Help make DVDInfoPro better with dvdinfomantis!!!
Copied dvd's say blank in computer only
menu making
Optiarc AD-7260S review
 Home > News > PC Parts > Intel Y...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Monday, December 24, 2007
Intel Yorkfield Chip Delay Due To Board Issues


Some motherboards slated to use quad-core Yorkfield processors are saddled with compatibility issues that may result in delays.

This, according to a report on the x86watch web site. The motherboards in question use Intel's upcoming 45-nanometer Q9550, Q9450, and Q9300 processors (otherwise referred to as Yorkfield non-Extreme).

An Intel spokesperson responded: "The 45nm Core 2 Quad launch is planned for Q1'08, and we are still on track for that." Rumors have been circulating that Intel is delaying Yorkfield non-Extreme processors strictly because, some theorize, competition from AMD has dwindled--due to quad-core Phenom and Barcelona delays--to the point that Intel saw no compelling reason to bring out new desktop processors.

Actually, there appears to be a more practical reason behind the delay, according to reports. Sources at Taiwan motherboard manufacturers are citing problems with the front-side bus (FSB) on certain boards that would use the Yorkfield non-Extreme processors. More specifically, mass-market four-layer boards, such as some P35-based boards, may have "noise" and stability issues, according to PC Watch which cited Taiwan motherboard vendors.

High-end, six-layer boards, such as those that use the X38 chipset, do not appear to have any FSB issues, according to the report. Consequently, high-end (six-layer) boards based on Intel's Extreme QX9650 do not have the issue, but lower-end boards using upcoming Yorkfield non-Extreme chips could potentially have issues. Apparently, Harpertown and dual-core Wolfdale boards do not have issues.

Finally, what rumors and reports seem to be missing is that Intel is not necessarily intentionally delaying these processors only because it believes that AMD is not competitive. The more plausible reason is that Intel believes that it has breathing room to fix the issue because of the AMD Barcelona and Phenom delays. The Intel fix may take one to two months, according to reports.

From x86watch web site



Previous
Next
AMD Phenom CPUs to See Further Delays        All News        Apple to go Intel with Handheld Devices
AMD Phenom CPUs to See Further Delays     PC Parts News      Samsung, Hitachi Sign Cross-licensing Aggreement on Hard Drives

Source Link Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
Intel Talks About Skylake At IDF
Intel Outlines Expanded RealSense And Optane Technologies At IDF
Intel To Bring Xeon Processors to Notebook PCs
Researcher Discovers Flaw in Intel Processors
Intel Teases With Skylake Processor Family and Z170 Express Chipset Debut
Intel Releases 3rd Gen Wireless-AC 8260 for Windows 10
Intel Skylake Processors To Provide Significant Graphics Boost
Intel And Rackspace To Promote The Benefits of the Cloud Through New Initiative
Intel Hits Q2 Financial Target, Pushes Back Transition to 10nm
Intel President To Leave The Company
Intel Compute Stick Comes With Ubuntu
Intel Eyes Future of Wearables With Acquisition Of Recon

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2015 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .