As it seems some people never learn from their mistakes and keep the same attributes. The below post was mentioned in a "friendly" website, commenting our exclusive EasyWrite tests:

"...While I respect cdrinfo for trying something new, I really feel tests like this should be left to certified testing facilities. While there might be some issues with the CRW-F1 before its EasyWrite certified, I had no problems getting the drive to work with InCD..."

Who said we are not certified testing labs for EasyWrite tests? Maybe the author of the above test, should check again his sources...Also the main idea ,and the most important, of Mt. Rainier format, is the proper handling of defect media, to ensure reliable re-writing. For now, only the EasyWrite test suite + defect test media can test this important feature. InCD may work just fine, has he tried with a scratched media? Probably not. Maybe the author of the above text should read more carefully our EasyWrite article to understand the main propose of Mt. Rainier format..

Lastly, we understand that our efforts to bring new tests are hard to accepted from some parties, and we promise not to let them down. Just check the upcoming Plextor PX-W208U review. More tests are coming

Visit www.cdrinfo.com - The Recording Authority

Would you care to mention the board of the "friendly" website this was posted

_________________
You get what you pay for...

(in reply to john)

Hi Clint
I have searched all the usual Suspects but I still can't find it
So come on John PLEASE tell us where it is so that we can put them right

Laffin Assassin

Always remember to Pillage BEFORE you Burn

(in reply to john)

Does't matter, who and where said that. This time we felt we had to "defend" our policy to bring new and more new tests. Already forgot it and moving on.

PS. In the near future (2+ weeks) more writing quality tests coming, beside C1/C2. This time we will not show any mercy to such ironic comments

Visit www.cdrinfo.com - The Recording Authority

(in reply to john)

Good for you Mate that's the way to GO you know all the regular members are behind you !!!

Laffin Assassin

Always remember to Pillage BEFORE you Burn

(in reply to john)

I know, just checking

Visit www.cdrinfo.com - The Recording Authority

(in reply to john)

_________________
You get what you pay for...

(in reply to john)

(in reply to john)

quote:

---

Originally posted by john

Does't matter, who and where said that. This time we felt we had to "defend" our policy to bring new and more new tests. Already forgot it and moving on.

PS. In the near future (2+ weeks) more writing quality tests coming, beside C1/C2. This time we will not show any mercy to such ironic comments [:(!]

Visit www.cdrinfo.com - The Recording Authority

---

Late to the party but, YOU GO BOY!

(in reply to john)

The new tests are on its way...[:p]

(in reply to john)

Great Stuff Mate !!![^]

(in reply to john)

What makes a testing lab a testing lab ? Even Dr. Thomas Pabst is not using a test lab every day for his new tests. Anand of AnandTech.com even does not do that. There are some benchmarks here , some tests there. If it came to quality writing and testing that , who needs a damn test lab ? If you are looking for certified labs , they are not usually found for the end user , but for the big companies :) TUV , KEMA and the Underwriter Laboratories make big bucks out of this :)

(in reply to john)

What rock did you fall from under?

(Biting My Tongue)

(in reply to john)

I won't Bite Mine as you all well know !!![:(!]
Hey John does this [:o)] come from that Site that were having a go [?]

(in reply to john)

> What makes a testing lab a testing lab ?

The quality of the tests, the exclusively of the tests and lastly the respect that indrustry has for our company

(in reply to john)

Well said John!! I was afraid I was gonna let my mouth go on overload. I do wonder where some of these ([:o)]'s) come from though. We're always here to help anyone that drops by....

(in reply to john)