[Deleted] (Full Version)

All Forums >> [In-House] >> Site News



Message


Deleted User -> [Deleted] (6/3/2005 9:37:12 AM)

[Deleted by Admins]




Iggy -> RE: Intel Pentium 4 660 3.6Ghz review (6/3/2005 4:25:44 PM)

hehe, I have the P4 530. If I had to go for a different system probably AMD would be my choice this time mostly because I like the double IDE on the boards something which misses from the Intel's 9xx chipset series.




Matthew -> RE: Intel Pentium 4 660 3.6Ghz review (6/4/2005 6:35:43 PM)

Without Win64, I don't suppose the 64-bitness of the CPU made any difference.




MP3Mogul -> RE: Intel Pentium 4 660 3.6Ghz review (6/4/2005 7:26:13 PM)

I'll stick with my prescott 3.2ghz for now, will be a while before I upgrade... besides I have 5 or 6 processors laying around that are all at least 2.8ghz or higher, so need need for an upgrade for a while.




emperor -> RE: Intel Pentium 4 660 3.6Ghz review (6/5/2005 6:47:08 AM)

I also have a P4 3.0Ghz with 64bit instructions, i must say i find the performance of x64 faster than win64 mostly when HDD is working




MP3Mogul -> RE: Intel Pentium 4 660 3.6Ghz review (6/5/2005 7:39:46 AM)

Same, as well, mostly when doing hard drive intense (SATA) items, do I really notice a difference.  I can get on my laptop, and sometimes it seems faster, so I don't really know, it's quite hard to tell these days.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.03125