semo -> motorola c975 vs. lg 8130 (4/27/2005 6:27:58 AM)
which is the best quality phone. don't care about their gimmicks. talking about battery life, sturdiness, good connection... you get the idea. i need it to last for about a year.
the motorola: [image]http://www.6630.be/IMG/moto/C975_06.jpg[/image] the lg [image]http://i10.ebayimg.com/02/i/03/41/58/5d_1_b.JPG[/image]
emperor -> RE: motorola c975 vs. lg 8130 (4/28/2005 7:22:25 PM)
Why not wait for the new Sony K750?
semo -> RE: motorola c975 vs. lg 8130 (4/29/2005 2:42:31 AM)
because i need a 3g phone and sony stuff is expensive
and the only good thing going for it is the camera but i don't really care about that
emperor -> RE: motorola c975 vs. lg 8130 (4/29/2005 6:22:43 PM)
sony ericsson mobiles are not so expensive, at least here, for 3G V800 from Sony seems to be a very good soltution
semo -> RE: motorola c975 vs. lg 8130 (4/29/2005 6:54:23 PM)
could be but here in the uk sony v800 looks very expensive.
anyway, i don't have a choice. the moto and lg have the best deals going for them