can you comment this results

CDRInfo Forum

Forums Register Login My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums

Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ Ticket List Log Out

Logged in as: Guest

Viewers: 1296

You can click here to see

Today's Posts |

Most Active Topics |

Posts Since Last Visit

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Optical Storage] >> CD, DVD, BD Drives >> Writing Quality >> can you comment this results

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

can you comment this results - 1/20/2005 1:06:47 PM

MarioGarcia

Posts: 10
Joined: 1/18/2005
Status: offline

hello
I have a bit problems with a plextor; I tried to do this test and ended with an error message.. is it due to the dvd+r in itself? or should I rma the drive?
my media is memorex printable dvd+r.
the error was 'address out of range.

Attachment (1)

Post #: 1

RE: can you comment this results - 1/20/2005 4:45:58 PM

emperor

Posts: 7002
Joined: 4/28/2004
Status: offline

how about make a cdspeed graph?

(in reply to MarioGarcia)

Post #: 2

RE: can you comment this results - 1/20/2005 5:01:05 PM

MP3Mogul

Posts: 5448
Joined: 4/11/2002
From: Retired Moderator
Status: offline

The memorex I used on my 716A produced the same result, I threw them in the trashcan, and got Verbatim and Fuji (TY) media... everything is wonderful now.

(in reply to emperor)

Post #: 3

RE: can you comment this results - 1/21/2005 10:14:40 AM

Iggy

Posts: 3349
Joined: 7/22/2004
From: Jupiter
Status: offline

Most printable I have use are less quality than the ordinary non printable version, I don't know, maybe a coincidence.

@ MarioGarcia

Since you have Plextools run a PI test intead of the jitter and also a CDSpeed, like in CDRinfo's reviews.

(in reply to MP3Mogul)

Post #: 4

RE: can you comment this results - 1/21/2005 11:26:14 AM

MarioGarcia

Posts: 10
Joined: 1/18/2005
Status: offline

thank you.
will try verbatim,
i'll follow your advices..
cd speed is ithe nero tool or is the read transfer test of plextools?
will come back with results..

(in reply to Iggy)

Post #: 5