emperor
Posts: 7002
Joined: 4/28/2004 Status: offline
|
thanks all people who commented our PX-716A review, at always we tried to post our test results, from my point of view, the PX-716A seems a decent drive, of course needs improvements, since BenQ DW1620A and NEC3500/3520A drives have raised the bar high enough at terms or writing quality... >Maybe you should be more specific and write that EAC DAE Quality does not support C2 retrieval from the PX-716A ... the PX-712A's C2 error reporting wasn't supported either up to the recent EAC version. You are correct, Minos should fix this at the review >and tell what's the difference ... I would try to burn DL images with CopyToDVD, i know 100% that has got certification from Philips for good DL burns (remember we have been using CopyToDVD from scratch, when many people had problems with Nero). Maybe DVD Decrypter needs some further tuning with the specific model, i would also try to burn a second disc before jumping at conclusion, of course the firmware is still beta and final 1.04 would perform much better... > I just try to find out if this new TA test is reliable or not. they wrote that Plextools' TA is not more than a joke due to its unreliable behaviour and inaccurate reporting. As far i saw, each Plextools TA "Scan" lasts around 16~20secs...Since you cannot really set nothing, i assume it takes a random number of samples (maybe not random, pre-defined) and measures them...I still feel a NeroCDSpeed scan shows more and a scan with the drive at terms of PI/PIF error rates will continued at our reviews..
|