[Deleted]

[Deleted] (Full Version)

All Forums >> [In-House] >> Users FeedBack

[Poll]

Do you find Packet Writing tests important?

Yes I do! Please continue them!

11% (2)

Nah, drop them, waste of time..

88% (16)

Total Votes : 18

(last vote on : 5/8/2006 9:42:36 PM)
(Poll will run till: -- )

Message

emperor -> RE: Do you find Packet Writing tests important? (5/9/2004 7:38:04 PM)
SP, the reality is that Packet Writing is a very small % of each user daily/normal use. Packet Writing supposed to re-gain its "glory" with technologies like "Mount-Rainier" however...as it seems no drive supports it either at CD or DVD format.[X(]

Clint -> RE: Do you find Packet Writing tests important? (5/11/2004 1:16:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Dolphinius_Rex I think out of all the tests done, that is the one I have the least interest in. I personally feel the same. Only because I do not packet write. But this test should probably be still here because there would no doubt be some members that packet write and need this info.. I am backing Mt. Rainier. (when it finally gets OS intergration that is).

Clint -> RE: Do you find Packet Writing tests important? (5/11/2004 1:18:45 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: emperor Packet Writing supposed to re-gain its "glory" with technologies like "Mount-Rainier" however...as it seems no drive supports it either at CD or DVD format.[X(] There are many drives that support Mt. Rainier through CD format. My Plextor W4824TA I just popped in supports it, and it's not the newest of CD recorders.. [;)]

dburg -> RE: Do you find Packet Writing tests important? (5/11/2004 2:26:08 AM)
Aren't DVD+RW mandatory recorded in packets?? Isn't the DVD-RAM write method packet as well?

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

8.203125E-02