Friday, March 27, 2015
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
Intel in Talks to buy Altera: report
MediaTek Releases New High-end Smartphone Helio SoC
Google To Get Into The Operating Room
Data Requests To Microsoft Decreased
Google Defeated in English Court - Decision Opens Door for Litigation by Millions of British Apple Users
LG G4 Smartphone Coming Late April
BlackBerry Posts Quarterly Profit
AMD Showcases DirectX 12 Performance in new 3DMark API Overhead Feature Test
Active Discussions
how to copy and move data files to dvd-rw
cdrw trouble
Need serious help!!!!
burning
nvidia 6200 review
Hello
Burning Multimedia in track 0
I'm lazy. Please help.
 Home > News > Mobiles > Law Fir...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Friday, May 02, 2014
Law Firm Files Antitrust Class-action Lawsuit Against Google


Consumer rights class-action law firm Hagens Berman has filed an antitrust class-action lawsuit against Google claiming the search engine giant "illegally monopolized, and financially and creatively stagnated the American market of internet and mobile search."

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleges that Google's monopoly of these markets stems from the company's purchasing of Android mobile operating system (Android OS) to maintain and expand its monopoly by pre-loading its own suite of applications onto the devices "by way of secret Mobile Application Distribution Agreements (MADA)." According to the suit, these agreements were hidden and marked to be viewed only by attorneys.

According to the suit, Google?s role in placing this suite of apps, including Google Play, and YouTube, among others, has hampered the market and kept the price of devices made by competing device manufactures like Samsung and HTC artificially high.

"It's clear that Google has not achieved this monopoly through offering a better search engine, but through its strategic, anti-competitive placement, and it doesn't take a forensic economist to see that this is evidence of market manipulation," said Steve Berman, attorney representing consumers and founding partner of Hagens Berman. "Simply put, there is no lawful, pro-competitive reason for Google to condition licenses to pre-load popular Google apps like this."

The complaint claims that if device manufacturers bound by Google's distribution agreements were free to choose a default search engine other than Google, the overall quality of Internet search would improve.

"The more use an internet or mobile search engine gets, the better it performs based on that use," Berman said. "Instead of finding a way to legitimately out-compete other internet and mobile search providers, they instead decided to choke off competition through this cynical, anti-consumer scheme."

The complaint notes that Google's monopoly not only suppresses its competition but also keeps the company itself from improving.

According to the lawsuit, "Google?s MADAs are contracts in restraint of trade that are designed to maintain and extend its monopolies in general search and handheld general search."

The lawsuit claims Google is in violation of a variety of federal and state antitrust laws, including the Sherman Act, the Clayton Antitrust Act, California Cartwright Act and California Unfair Competition Law.

Google said Android and Google can be used independent of each other. "Anyone can use Android without Google and anyone can use Google without Android. Since Android's introduction, greater competition in smartphones has given consumers more choices at lower prices," Matt Kallman, a Google spokesman said.

The named plaintiffs include Gary Feitelson, a resident of Louisville, Kentucky and owner of an HTC EVO 3D mobile phone, and Daniel McKee, a resident of Des Moines, Iowa and owner of a Samsung Galaxy S III mobile phone. According to the complaint, in both situations, the owner's phones should have cost less and had better search capabilities as the result of competition that would have ensued, had Google's MADA restraints not existed.

The lawsuit seeks to represent all U.S. purchasers of any Android OS mobile telephone or tablet as to which Google and the manufacturer of such device has entered into a contract or contracts, including the MADA, by which Google has conditioned the right to pre-load any application from a suite of Google applications on to manufacturer's mandatory acceptance.

The lawsuit seeks damages for individuals who have purchased these devices at an artificially high price due to Google?s alleged price-fixing, anticompetitive restrictions.




Previous
Next
Apple, Facebook, Others To Notify Users of Government Data Demands        All News        Sony Reaches Deal To Sell PC Business
LG G3 Smartphone Images Hit The Web     Mobiles News      Michael Jackson Is Alive Through Sony's Music Unlimited Service

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
Google To Get Into The Operating Room
Google Defeated in English Court - Decision Opens Door for Litigation by Millions of British Apple Users
New Android Installer Vulnerability Exposes Android Device Users to Data Theft
Google To Show Targetted Ads To Fiber TV Customers
Consumer Watchdog Calls On FTC To Re-Open Its Google Investigation
Report Details Google's Anti-competitive Practices
Android Watch To Keep a Watch on Your Phone
Hundreds of Thousands of Google Apps Domains' Private WHOIS Information Disclosed
Google Is Killing Google Code
Google Maps Take You To Mount Everest
Google Starts Offering Low-Cost Cloud Service
Android 5.1 Lollipop Update Officially Released

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2015 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .