Tuesday, September 19, 2017
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
New Amazon Fire HD 10: 1080p Full HD Display, Faster Performance, for $150
CyberLink Introduces 360 Video Editing Tools with PowerDirector 16 and Director Suite 6
Pioneer Introduces New CDJ-2000NXS2-W and DJM-900NXS2-W
AUO Presents 85-inch 8K4K Bezel-less TV Display
South Korean Government Wants to Stop Technology "Leaks" to China
Fujitsu Develops Wearable, Hands-Free Speech Translation Device
Dell Sees Solid Growth in Worldwide PC Monitor Market
Intel Showcases 10 nm Updates, a new aspect for Moore's Law, FPGA Progress and 64-Layer 3D NAND for Data Center
Active Discussions
Which of these DVD media are the best, most durable?
How to back up a PS2 DL game
Copy a protected DVD?
roxio issues with xp pro
Help make DVDInfoPro better with dvdinfomantis!!!
menu making
Optiarc AD-7260S review
cdrw trouble
 Home > News > General Computing > Judge R...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Judge Rejects Samsung's Demand For New Trial, Apple's Patent Award Demands


A court in California on Tuesday denied Samsung a retrial in a patent infringement dispute with Apple, and also declined to raise the damages earlier awarded to Apple.

The court also granted judgment as matter of law that Samsung's patent infringement was not willful - a finding that could have formed the basis to triple the damages owed by Samsung.

Last August, a jury decided that that the Samsung must pay Apple US$1.05 billion for infringing design and utility patents in Samsung smartphones and tablets.

Samsung asked for a new trial of the case, alleging that the foreman of the jury was untruthful and biased.

On Tuesday, Judge Lucy H. Koh of U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose division, said the jury "had ample opportunity to compensate Apple for Samsung's use of its product designs." The jury awarded $382 million in damages for six products found to have diluted Apple's trade dress patents, but Apple filed for an additional $400 million. "Apple had not clearly shown that it was not adequately compensated for the losses it suffered due to Samsung's dilution of its trade dress in its products," Judge Koh wrote.

The Judge also denied Samsung's motion for judgement that none of Samsung's accused phones infringed Apple's design patents, and also denied Samsung's motion in the for a new trial.

The court also ruled against Samsung's claim that some Apple patents in the suit were invalid for indefiniteness, while granting an Apple plea that claims of a Samsung patent were invalid.


Previous
Next
Smaller Apple TV In The Works        All News        Nintendo Wii U Fails To Boost The Company's Profits
Sony's Music Unlimited Service To Offer High-Quality Audio     General Computing News      LG Reports Revenue Decrease, Operating Profits For 2012

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
iOS 11 is Available on Tuesday
Samsung Galaxy Note8 Available in Stores Today
Both LG and Samsung Invest EUR25 million in OLED Material Developer Cynora
Samsung to Create US$300 Million Fund for Auto-related Technologies
Apple Unveils iPhone X, iPhone 8 and 8 Plus, Apple TV 4K and Apple Watch 3
Samsung SDI Introduces Battery Technology Advancements for Electric Vehicles
Samsung Mobile Chief Confirms Foldable Phone Project
Samsung Adds New 11nm LPP and 7nm LPP With EUV Technology in its Foundry Portfolio
Apple's New Flagship iPhone to Be Called 'iPhone X'
Judge Clears Apple to Sue Qualcomm
Samsung Develops First 28nm Embedded Flash Memory Process
Samsung to Launch Mobile Security Rewards Program

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2017 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .