Thursday, April 19, 2018
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
Garmin Announces Connect IQ 3.0 with New apps from Trailforks, Yelp, iHeartRadio
Intel Open Sources the nGraph Compiler for Deep Learning Systems
Facebook Seeking to Hire Chip Designers
Regulatory Filing Hints at New iPhones
Western Digital Pushes Conventional Magnetic Hard Disk Tech to its Limits in New 14TB Ultrastar DC HC530
Retail Rivals Amazon and Best Buy Enter Exclusive Partnership to Offer New Fire TV Edition Smart TVs
ASML's Solid Q1 Results Demonstrate Further Adoption of EUV Technology
Amazon Launches the International Shopping Feature in the Amazon Shopping App
Active Discussions
Which of these DVD media are the best, most durable?
How to back up a PS2 DL game
Copy a protected DVD?
roxio issues with xp pro
Help make DVDInfoPro better with dvdinfomantis!!!
menu making
Optiarc AD-7260S review
cdrw trouble
 Home > News > General Computing > Judge R...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Judge Rejects Samsung's Demand For New Trial, Apple's Patent Award Demands


A court in California on Tuesday denied Samsung a retrial in a patent infringement dispute with Apple, and also declined to raise the damages earlier awarded to Apple.

The court also granted judgment as matter of law that Samsung's patent infringement was not willful - a finding that could have formed the basis to triple the damages owed by Samsung.

Last August, a jury decided that that the Samsung must pay Apple US$1.05 billion for infringing design and utility patents in Samsung smartphones and tablets.

Samsung asked for a new trial of the case, alleging that the foreman of the jury was untruthful and biased.

On Tuesday, Judge Lucy H. Koh of U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose division, said the jury "had ample opportunity to compensate Apple for Samsung's use of its product designs." The jury awarded $382 million in damages for six products found to have diluted Apple's trade dress patents, but Apple filed for an additional $400 million. "Apple had not clearly shown that it was not adequately compensated for the losses it suffered due to Samsung's dilution of its trade dress in its products," Judge Koh wrote.

The Judge also denied Samsung's motion for judgement that none of Samsung's accused phones infringed Apple's design patents, and also denied Samsung's motion in the for a new trial.

The court also ruled against Samsung's claim that some Apple patents in the suit were invalid for indefiniteness, while granting an Apple plea that claims of a Samsung patent were invalid.


Previous
Next
Smaller Apple TV In The Works        All News        Nintendo Wii U Fails To Boost The Company's Profits
Sony's Music Unlimited Service To Offer High-Quality Audio     General Computing News      LG Reports Revenue Decrease, Operating Profits For 2012

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
Apple Said to Release News Subscription Service
Samsung to Release Its First MicroLED TVs in 2018
Apple Caught Employees and Contractors Leaking Company's Unannounced Projects
Samsung Galaxy J2 Pro Smartphone Has no Data Connectivity
Samsung 360 Round 3D Video Camera and Samsung DeX Pad Now Available
Apple introduces iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus (PRODUCT)RED Special Edition
Samsung Reports Profit on High Memory Sales
Future iPhones Said to Have Touchless Controls and Curved Screens
Samsung Launches the Notebook Odyssey Z for Gaming
Intel Under Pressure as Report Says Apple is Designing its Own Chips for Macs
Samsung Notebook 5 and Notebook 3 Target General Users
Apple iOS 11.3 Update Brings Privacy Tools Ahead of GDPR

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2018 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .