Monday, June 18, 2018
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
HPE Says Astra is The World's largest Arm-based Supercomputer
Garmin fēnix 5 Plus GPS Sportswatch Adds Maps, Music, Garmin Pay and Wrist-based Pulse Ox
Google Uses Deep Learning to Predict When a Patient Will Die
Volvo Penta Unveils Self-docking Yacht Technology
iOS 12 Will Automatically Share Your Location with The Police
Google to Invest $550 Million in China E-Commerce Site JD
Intel to Showcase AI and HPC Demos at ISC
Google Introduces the VR180 Creator to Simplify Video Editing
Active Discussions
Which of these DVD media are the best, most durable?
How to back up a PS2 DL game
Copy a protected DVD?
roxio issues with xp pro
Help make DVDInfoPro better with dvdinfomantis!!!
menu making
Optiarc AD-7260S review
cdrw trouble
 Home > News > General Computing > Judge R...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Judge Rejects Samsung's Demand For New Trial, Apple's Patent Award Demands


A court in California on Tuesday denied Samsung a retrial in a patent infringement dispute with Apple, and also declined to raise the damages earlier awarded to Apple.

The court also granted judgment as matter of law that Samsung's patent infringement was not willful - a finding that could have formed the basis to triple the damages owed by Samsung.

Last August, a jury decided that that the Samsung must pay Apple US$1.05 billion for infringing design and utility patents in Samsung smartphones and tablets.

Samsung asked for a new trial of the case, alleging that the foreman of the jury was untruthful and biased.

On Tuesday, Judge Lucy H. Koh of U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose division, said the jury "had ample opportunity to compensate Apple for Samsung's use of its product designs." The jury awarded $382 million in damages for six products found to have diluted Apple's trade dress patents, but Apple filed for an additional $400 million. "Apple had not clearly shown that it was not adequately compensated for the losses it suffered due to Samsung's dilution of its trade dress in its products," Judge Koh wrote.

The Judge also denied Samsung's motion for judgement that none of Samsung's accused phones infringed Apple's design patents, and also denied Samsung's motion in the for a new trial.

The court also ruled against Samsung's claim that some Apple patents in the suit were invalid for indefiniteness, while granting an Apple plea that claims of a Samsung patent were invalid.


Previous
Next
Smaller Apple TV In The Works        All News        Nintendo Wii U Fails To Boost The Company's Profits
Sony's Music Unlimited Service To Offer High-Quality Audio     General Computing News      LG Reports Revenue Decrease, Operating Profits For 2012

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
iOS 12 Will Automatically Share Your Location with The Police
Samsung Lost FinFET Patent Case, Ordered to Pay $400 Million
Oprah to Work With Apple on New Programming
New Samsung Chromebook Plus V2 Gets New Processors and Cameras
Samsung Launches Fund to Invest in AI Startups
Apple to Patch iPhone Security Hole Used by Police
Apple 2019 iPhones Said to Have a USB-C Port
Apple Bans Apps From Sharing Information on Users' Friends
Analysts Talks About Samsung's Upcoming Foldable Galaxy Smartphone
Samsung Begins Production of 16Gb, 64GB DDR4 RDIMM For Servers
Samsung and LG Eye Expansions into the Car Display Market
Important Hearings to Determine Apple and Qualcomm's Legal Dispute

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2018 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .