Monday, October 20, 2014
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
Biostar Relases New iDEQ-T1 Compact Desktop
SK Telecom and Samsung Join Hands to Lead 5G Network Technology
Pantech Applied for Bankruptcy Protection In The US
Glonbalfoundries Buy IBM's Micorelectronics Business
Microsoft To Launch A Wearable Device Soon
FCC To Explore High-frequency Wireless Technologies
Mozilla Hello Offers Voice and Video Calls Through The Browser
Samsung Adds Intel Processor To Chromebook 2
Active Discussions
How to generate lots of different CDs quickly
Yamaha CRW-F1UX
help questions structure DVDR
Made video, won't play back easily
Questions durability monitor LCD
Questions fungus CD/DVD Media, Some expert engineer in optical media can help me?
CD, DVD and Blu-ray burning for Android in development
IBM supercharges Power servers with graphics chips
 Home > News > General Computing > Judge R...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Judge Rejects Samsung's Demand For New Trial, Apple's Patent Award Demands


A court in California on Tuesday denied Samsung a retrial in a patent infringement dispute with Apple, and also declined to raise the damages earlier awarded to Apple.

The court also granted judgment as matter of law that Samsung's patent infringement was not willful - a finding that could have formed the basis to triple the damages owed by Samsung.

Last August, a jury decided that that the Samsung must pay Apple US$1.05 billion for infringing design and utility patents in Samsung smartphones and tablets.

Samsung asked for a new trial of the case, alleging that the foreman of the jury was untruthful and biased.

On Tuesday, Judge Lucy H. Koh of U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose division, said the jury "had ample opportunity to compensate Apple for Samsung's use of its product designs." The jury awarded $382 million in damages for six products found to have diluted Apple's trade dress patents, but Apple filed for an additional $400 million. "Apple had not clearly shown that it was not adequately compensated for the losses it suffered due to Samsung's dilution of its trade dress in its products," Judge Koh wrote.

The Judge also denied Samsung's motion for judgement that none of Samsung's accused phones infringed Apple's design patents, and also denied Samsung's motion in the for a new trial.

The court also ruled against Samsung's claim that some Apple patents in the suit were invalid for indefiniteness, while granting an Apple plea that claims of a Samsung patent were invalid.


Previous
Next
Smaller Apple TV In The Works        All News        Nintendo Wii U Fails To Boost The Company's Profits
Sony's Music Unlimited Service To Offer High-Quality Audio     General Computing News      LG Reports Revenue Decrease, Operating Profits For 2012

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
SK Telecom and Samsung Join Hands to Lead 5G Network Technology
New 64-bit Exynos 7 Octa Processor Supports Iris Recognition
Apple Introduces New iPad Air 2, iPad mini 3 And iMac with Retina 5K Display
New iPads Leaked Ahead Of Official Launch Event
Samsung Claims 5G Speed Record
Facebook And Samsung Executives Discuss Mobile, Content Collaborations
Samsung SDI and LG Chem Showcase Advanced Batteries
New iPhones Arrive in 36 More Countries This Month
Samsung Gevelops 5 Times Faster WiFi technology
GT To Stop Production In Sapphire Plant, Accuses Apple Of 'Oppressive" Contract Terms
Apple and Google Each worth more than USD $100
Icahn Urges Apple To Start Buying Back More Stock

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2014 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .