CDRInfo Forum CDRInfo Forum

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

[Deleted]   Logged in as: Guest
Viewers: 899 You can click here to see Today's Posts | Most Active Topics | Posts Since Last Visit
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [In-House] >> Site News >> [Deleted] Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
[Deleted] - 12/12/2005 8:27:08 AM   
Deleted User
[Deleted by Admins]

(in reply to Scour1)
  Post #: 49
RE: Waiting for reviews :) - 12/12/2005 10:04:55 AM   
Scour1

 

Posts: 153
Joined: 5/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: minos

Yeap it is...



I´ll wait for your next reviews when you test with Q4A

What drives you have in the review-queue ?

(in reply to Deleted User)
Post #: 50
RE: Waiting for reviews :) - 12/16/2005 12:57:08 PM   
Scour1

 

Posts: 153
Joined: 5/7/2004
Status: offline
Plextor PX 750

Looks not good to me.

No 12x DVD-writing avaible, slow when reading, burn many 16x-media only @4x, produces coasters with MCC004, writing-quality overall not good.

I don´t think that the Benq DQ 60 performs better


(in reply to Scour1)
Post #: 51
[Deleted] - 12/16/2005 1:44:59 PM   
Deleted User
[Deleted by Admins]

(in reply to Scour1)
  Post #: 52
RE: Waiting for reviews :) - 12/16/2005 2:52:56 PM   
Scour1

 

Posts: 153
Joined: 5/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: minos

There are many burners in our labs, even the 755A.


Yeah, throw the 750 away and test the 755

AFAIK the Benq DQ 60 is waiting for a new FW, too, but Benq seems to support it not so well like the writers with Philips/Nexperia-chipsets

(in reply to Deleted User)
Post #: 53
RE: Waiting for reviews :) - 12/20/2005 11:30:14 AM   
Scour1

 

Posts: 153
Joined: 5/7/2004
Status: offline
Reading the Sony DW-Q30A-review :)

http://cdrinfo.com/Sections/Reviews/Specific.aspx?ArticleId=15850&PageId=4

Maybe on this site some errors, in the read-tests no Sony is listed.

I just wonder about the writing-quality, 16x +R is overall bad, -R is very good, with 8x-media +R looks good and -R not good.

(in reply to Scour1)
Post #: 54
[Deleted] - 12/20/2005 5:01:08 PM   
Deleted User
[Deleted by Admins]

(in reply to Scour1)
  Post #: 55
RE: Waiting for reviews :) - 12/20/2005 8:39:36 PM   
Scour1

 

Posts: 153
Joined: 5/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: minos

Yeap, I'll have to change the graphs...

As for the writing quality it is a question and that's why we always burn so many media.


Yeah, and I like it :) because writing-quality is very important for me

(in reply to Deleted User)
Post #: 56
[Deleted] - 12/21/2005 4:28:01 AM   
Deleted User
[Deleted by Admins]

(in reply to Scour1)
  Post #: 57
RE: Waiting for reviews :) - 12/21/2005 2:29:53 PM   
Scour1

 

Posts: 153
Joined: 5/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: minos

Fixed, thanks for the help.


No prob ;)

(in reply to Deleted User)
Post #: 58
RE: Waiting for reviews :) - 1/6/2006 8:58:22 PM   
Scour1

 

Posts: 153
Joined: 5/7/2004
Status: offline
Read the Plextor 755-review :)

The Plextor offers nice features, again.

Looks not bad, but I´m not sure how many people buy a Plextor for this price, for the half cost you can get a LG, Benq, NEC or Pioneer.

(in reply to Scour1)
Post #: 59
RE: Waiting for reviews :) - 1/7/2006 6:36:44 AM   
Antonio


Posts: 1320
Joined: 7/21/2005
Status: offline
To be ownest those features are not something special. What's the new thing? Destroy media? Give me one and I'll show you how this should be like.
Q-Check is not something new, neither Autostrategy.

And I liked a lot the riplock at 2X, perfect.

There's no doubt that my 716SA is much better.


_____________________________

salute proffessionista!

(in reply to Scour1)
Post #: 60
RE: Waiting for reviews :) - 1/7/2006 6:40:01 AM   
Scour1

 

Posts: 153
Joined: 5/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Antonio

To be ownest those features are not something special. What's the new thing? Destroy media? Give me one and I'll show you how this should be like.
Q-Check is not something new, neither Autostrategy.

And I liked a lot the riplock at 2X, perfect.

There's no doubt that my 716SA is much better.


I said not "new" features

Know some guiys that have their 3.rd or 4. 716 in one year because the drives hve no long life

(in reply to Antonio)
Post #: 61
RE: Waiting for reviews :) - 1/7/2006 6:42:40 AM   
Antonio


Posts: 1320
Joined: 7/21/2005
Status: offline
I know. But after so much time the 755 should have something more than the 716.

The life is depending on how much do you use it. I burn one disc per day maximum so I don't worry about it.


_____________________________

salute proffessionista!

(in reply to Scour1)
Post #: 62
RE: Waiting for reviews :) - 1/9/2006 8:01:49 PM   
Scour1

 

Posts: 153
Joined: 5/7/2004
Status: offline
Reading the 162L-review :)

Looks good in DVD+R, but DVD-R is awful :(
.
Just wonder why it can backup SD3.1. Looks like the Samsung have an older chipset from MTK than the Liteon 16H5S, but the Lite can´t make a working backup of SD3.1

(in reply to Antonio)
Post #: 63
RE: Waiting for reviews :) - 1/10/2006 1:55:17 AM   
Antonio


Posts: 1320
Joined: 7/21/2005
Status: offline
I am wondering if there will be drive that can backup more recent SD versions than 3.1. Do you think this is possible? Or it is just marketing reasons?


_____________________________

salute proffessionista!

(in reply to Scour1)
Post #: 64
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [In-House] >> Site News >> [Deleted] Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.047