Sunday, August 31, 2014
Search
  
Most Popular
Hardware Reviews
PC Parts
Toshiba HG6 256GB 2.5-inch SSD review
Shuttle Omninas KS10 review
Crucial MX100 512GB SSD review
WEB Reviews
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 V.3 4TB SAS 6Gb/s HDD Review
OCZ Vector 256GB SSD Review @ Custom PC Review
Gigabyte F2A85XM-D3H
NZXT Phantom 630
Auvio Bluetooth Portable Speaker Review
Corsair H90 CPU Cooler Review
BIOSTAR Hi-Fi Z77X (Intel Z77) Motherboard Review
Noctua NH-L9i Cooler Review on Technic3D
Breaking News
Intel Hopes To Improve Its Mobile Business With Ex-Qualcomm exec
Kingston HyperX Demos DDR4 Memory at PAX Prime
Corsair and ASUS Fastest DDR4 Memory Kit
Intel Unleashes its First 8-Core Desktop Processor For Gaming
Samsung Partners with Nike On Running App
Samsung Applied for Samsung Quantum Dot TV Trademark
New iPhones Expected at Sept. 9 Event
Google Tests Drones For Delivery Of Goods
Home > Hardware Reviews > PC Parts

Tuesday, April 20, 2004
OCZ PC-4200EL Memory Review

3. MSI Neo2 - FISR Testing procedure

OCZ PC-4200EL Memory - Page 3

- MSI Neo2-FISR general testing procedure

Each DDR memory module was installed in the 1st and 3rd bank respectively. For optimum results we didn?t overclock the SVGA card, running at stock speeds with official Catalyst v4.30 installed.

The following BIOS settings were used for all tests:

- Dynamic overclocking: Disable
- Performance Mode: Slow
- DRAM Frequency: 400Mhz
- Spread Spectrum: Disabled
- AGPI/PCI: 66.66/33.33
- VCore: 1.550V
- AGP: 1.60V
- DDR Voltage: 2.85V
- Burst Length: 4

The first step was to set the memory timings at 2.5-4-4-7 and 2-3-3-6. Unfortunaly the MSI Neo2-FISR, despite our efforts, could not set the memory timings to 2-3-3-6 but only to 2.5-3-3-6. The BIOS showed timings of 2-3-3-6 but under windows we saw that the correct timings were 2.5-3-3-6.

Also, no higher relaxed timings were possible (3-4-4-8). After checking other hardware reviews, we believe the problem lies with the MSI motherboard?

After the initial tests at 200 MHz, we started pushing the system by raising the FSB. We found the upper limit with the tight timings (2.5-3-3-6) at both 1:1 and 5:4 and the maximum speed with default timings (2.5-4-4-7) at both 1:1 and 5:4 (FSB:RAM).

PAT was not used for any test since the system could not boot at either speed (again, possibly a specific M/B problem?). With the FSB 290 MHz (1:1) we raised the DDR voltage up to 2.90V to reach maximum stability. Both Memtest86+ and 3D Mark2001SE did not report any problems but?Prime95 after running for one hour stopped working, producing an error! This is why we selected the FSB 270 MHz as the maximum speed for this test. We decided to provide the FSB 272 MHz results for evaluation proposes. It is possible that a different combination of M/B and CPU cooler could produce higher (and better) results than even 272 MHz as various other testers have shown.

Summarizing, we tested the following FSB/Divider/Timings/DDR Voltage:

FSB
Divider
Memory
Timings
DDR
Voltage
CPU
Speed
Comment
200
1:1
2.5-4-4-7
2.85V
2.40 GHz
200
1:1
2.5-3-3-6
2.40 GHz
228
1:1
2.5-3-3-6
2.73 GHz
(max FSB with tight timings for 1:1 stable)
267
1:1
2.5-4-4-7
3.20 GHz
270
1:1
2.5-4-4-7
3.24 GHz
(max FSB with relaxed timing for 1:1 stable)
272
1:1
2.5-4-4-7
3.26 GHz
280
5:4
2.5-3-3-6
2.90V
3.36 GHz
(max FSB with tight timings for 5:4 not stable)
290
5:4
2.5-4-4-7
2.85V
3.48 GHz
(max FSB with relaxed timings for 5:4 not stable)

As you can see, with FSB 290 MHz (5:4) the CPU reaches the incredible 3.48 GHz. Of course the system was not stable enough to run 3D Mark2001Se neither Prime95 at both FSB 290/280 MHz, however by using liquid cooling, it could produce a stable system?:-)

The system was rock solid at 1:1 at 270 MHz, while the CPU reached?3.240 GHz. That?s a 0.8 GHz overclocking gap!




Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message


 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2014 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .