Friday, October 24, 2014
Search
  
Most Popular
Hardware Reviews
Optical Storage
WEB Reviews
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 V.3 4TB SAS 6Gb/s HDD Review
OCZ Vector 256GB SSD Review @ Custom PC Review
Gigabyte F2A85XM-D3H
NZXT Phantom 630
Auvio Bluetooth Portable Speaker Review
Corsair H90 CPU Cooler Review
BIOSTAR Hi-Fi Z77X (Intel Z77) Motherboard Review
Noctua NH-L9i Cooler Review on Technic3D
Breaking News
HP Broadens Moonshot Portfolio With Intel-powered Models
Microsoft To Keep Nokia Brand For Low-end Smartphones
LG Introduces Its First Octa-Core Application Processor
Cloud and Surface 3 Drive Microsoft's Revenue
Micron Urges Investors To Reject TRC Capital's Unsolicited Tender Offer
Facebook Returns To Chat Roots With Rooms App
Sony SmartWatch 3 And LG G Watch R Are Rolling Out With Updated Android Wear Software
New Nvidia Driver Enable DSR On Older Graphics Cards
Home > Hardware Reviews > Optical Storage > DVD External

Monday, January 05, 2004
Philips JackRabbit4

2. Data CD Reading Tests

Philips JackRabbit4 DVD+RW recorder - Page 2

Data CD Reading Tests

- Pressed CD results (Click for CDSpeed results)

As can be seen from the table above, the Philips JR4DVDRW was faster than the Pioneer DVR-SK12D used here for comparison, and in fact a good deal faster. The End Speed for the Philips drive confirms the manufacturer's stated maxixmum in the specifications (40x), reaching a final reading speed of 42.56x.

Unfortunately the Philips drive was not compatible with CDSpeed's seek times test, neither with the latest version nor with older versions. As such, we cannot present seek times against those of the Pioneer for comparison purposes. For this reason, we present access times, measured again with CDSpeed.

 

- CD-R Media results (Click for CDSpeed results)

In this test, we copied the pressed disc used in the previous test onto CDR media, in order to check the reading behaviour of drive with CDR media and to also check if there is a difference in comparison with the original pressed CD.

Both drives returned result almost identical to those of the previous test. Once again, the Philips drive was much faster than Pioneer.

On the left are the access times for the Philips drive, which are almost the same for both read tests with pressed and CDR media.

 

 

 

- ReWritable Media (Click for CDSpeed results)

For this test we used 24x High Speed rewritable media from Mitsubishi Chemicals.

The Philips drive also showed the same, good performance with RW media. Again, the Pioneer drive had lower speeds with this media too.




Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message


 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2014 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .