Saturday, October 25, 2014
Search
  
Most Popular
Hardware Reviews
Optical Storage
WEB Reviews
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 V.3 4TB SAS 6Gb/s HDD Review
OCZ Vector 256GB SSD Review @ Custom PC Review
Gigabyte F2A85XM-D3H
NZXT Phantom 630
Auvio Bluetooth Portable Speaker Review
Corsair H90 CPU Cooler Review
BIOSTAR Hi-Fi Z77X (Intel Z77) Motherboard Review
Noctua NH-L9i Cooler Review on Technic3D
Breaking News
Internet Explorer 11 Toolkit Allows Enterprise Admins "Spy" On Their Employees
FCC Says Airwave Auction To Delay Until 2016
HP Broadens Moonshot Portfolio With Intel-powered Models
Microsoft To Keep Nokia Brand For Low-end Smartphones
LG Introduces Its First Octa-Core Application Processor
Cloud and Surface 3 Drive Microsoft's Revenue
Micron Urges Investors To Reject TRC Capital's Unsolicited Tender Offer
Facebook Returns To Chat Roots With Rooms App
Home > Hardware Reviews > Optical Storage

Monday, February 18, 2002
PleXWriter PX-S88TU Vs TEAC CD-RW280PU

3. Data Tests

Plextor PX-S88TU - Page 3

Data Tests

Test Method:
- SCSI Mechanic v3.0x: This was used to compare the drive's  I/O performance against other various CDR-W drives (see charts). We used a pressed CD containing PlexTools v1.08 for all tests.
- Nero CD Speed v0.84b was also used to check the drive's performance with pressed CDs. For that test, we also used the PlexTools v1.08 pressed CD.

- SCSI Mechanic v3.0x results:

The PleXWriter PX-S88TU managed to overpass TEAC CD-RW280PU in the "Average Sequential I/O" test. The Plextor had 2704Kb/s and the TEAC 2637Kb/s. On the other hand the TEAC, due to its lower seek times, has a better "Average Random I/O" mark and higher "Same Sector I/O" performance. Both drives support up to 24x (CAV) reading speed, which is more than enough for an external portable CD-RW drive.

- Nero CD Speed v0.84 results: (Plextor S88TU CD Speed graphs)

Using Nero CD Speed 0.84, we confirmed the SCSI Mechanic results. The PleXWriter PX-S88TU is faster than TEAC CD-RW280PU. It starts reading faster and its ending speed is also higher than the TEAC. The PleXWriter PX-S88TU has an average of 18.51X, while the TEAC CD-RW280PU has 18.01X.

In the "Seek Times" test, the TEAC drive is faster than the Plextor drive, as expected. TEAC models usually have the lowest seek times, and from our tests this was confirmed once again. The random seek time for TEAC is 109ms, while for the PleXWriter it is 119ms.

- PSX Pressed Media

For this test we used the PSX game 'NBA Jam Extreme' and we ripped the image to HD with CloneCD. We measured the reading times for both tested drives. Plextor is the winner here with only 122secs, while the TEAC needs 28 more seconds to complete the image:

- CDR Media: (Plextor S88TU CD Speed graphs)

With CDR media, both drives performed better than with the pressed test disc. The PleXWriter still holds the first place, with 18.53X and TEAC loses with 18,39X.




Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message


 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2014 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .