Saturday, October 01, 2016
Search
  
Most Popular
Hardware Reviews
PC Parts
Crucial MX300 750GB SSD review
Shuttle XPC Slim DS67U Barebone
Kingston DC400 960GB SSD review
WEB Reviews
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 V.3 4TB SAS 6Gb/s HDD Review
OCZ Vector 256GB SSD Review @ Custom PC Review
Gigabyte F2A85XM-D3H
NZXT Phantom 630
Auvio Bluetooth Portable Speaker Review
Corsair H90 CPU Cooler Review
BIOSTAR Hi-Fi Z77X (Intel Z77) Motherboard Review
Noctua NH-L9i Cooler Review on Technic3D
Breaking News
LG Curved OLEDs Not Ready For The G6 Smartphone: report
Google Faces Fine Over Anti-competitive Android Practices: report
Hackers Probed Voting Systems, U.S. Says
Apple Ows $302.4 million to VirnetX, Court Rules
California Proposes Law That Would Require No Human Presence In Self-driving Cars
Shuttle Releases New Palm-sized and 4K Ultra Slim PC-NC02U Series
Nintendo NES Classic Edition Launches In November, NX Could be Announced Earlier
Foxconn's Sharp to Invest $570 Million on Flexible OLED Panel Production
Home > Hardware Reviews > PC Parts

Monday, January 14, 2013
Samsung M3 1TB USB 3.0 HDD review

5. Benchmarks - page 3

The next benchmark is the CrystalDiskMark. The software provides throughput data based on sequential reads and writes, and random (512K/4K/4KQD32) reads and writes of various sizes. Below you see the drive's performance with both compressible and incompressible data, which makes no difference in case of our HDD:

CrystalMark 3.0.1 x64 - Reading (Default Pattern)
WD 7200 500GB Black Scorpio Edition
Samsung M3 1TB USB 3.0
Seq
70.34 MB/s
117.4 MB/s
512K
33.97 MB/s
39.54 MB/s
4K
0.543 MB/s
0.466 MB/s
4K QD32
1.319 MB/s
0.549 MB/s

 

CrystalMark 3.0.1 x64 - Writing (Default Pattern)
WD 7200 500GB Black Scorpio Edition
Samsung M3 1TB USB 3.0
Seq
70.26 MB/s
117.4 MB/s
512K
49.27 MB/s
41.94 MB/s
4K
1.22 MB/s
0.937 MB/s
4K QD32
1.23 MB/s
0.935 MB/s




Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message


 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2016 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .