Saturday, July 30, 2016
Search
  
Most Popular
Hardware Reviews
PC Parts
Crucial MX300 750GB SSD review
WEB Reviews
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 V.3 4TB SAS 6Gb/s HDD Review
OCZ Vector 256GB SSD Review @ Custom PC Review
Gigabyte F2A85XM-D3H
NZXT Phantom 630
Auvio Bluetooth Portable Speaker Review
Corsair H90 CPU Cooler Review
BIOSTAR Hi-Fi Z77X (Intel Z77) Motherboard Review
Noctua NH-L9i Cooler Review on Technic3D
Breaking News
Alphabet Posts Strong Revenue on Video Market
Games Outweigh Sagging Sensors For Sony
Microsoft To Further Cut Jobs Towards The Final Exit From Phone Business
AMD Radeon RX 470 And RX 460 Are Shipping in Early August
Worldwide Smartphone Volumes Relatively Flat in Q2 2016
Oracle to Buy NetSuite for $9.3 Billion
Samsung and Nestle Collaborate on the Internet of Things and Nutrition
Home Appliance and Home Entertainment Units Help LG's Quarterly Profits
Home > Hardware Reviews > PC Parts

Monday, January 14, 2013
Samsung M3 1TB USB 3.0 HDD review

5. Benchmarks - page 3

The next benchmark is the CrystalDiskMark. The software provides throughput data based on sequential reads and writes, and random (512K/4K/4KQD32) reads and writes of various sizes. Below you see the drive's performance with both compressible and incompressible data, which makes no difference in case of our HDD:

CrystalMark 3.0.1 x64 - Reading (Default Pattern)
WD 7200 500GB Black Scorpio Edition
Samsung M3 1TB USB 3.0
Seq
70.34 MB/s
117.4 MB/s
512K
33.97 MB/s
39.54 MB/s
4K
0.543 MB/s
0.466 MB/s
4K QD32
1.319 MB/s
0.549 MB/s

 

CrystalMark 3.0.1 x64 - Writing (Default Pattern)
WD 7200 500GB Black Scorpio Edition
Samsung M3 1TB USB 3.0
Seq
70.26 MB/s
117.4 MB/s
512K
49.27 MB/s
41.94 MB/s
4K
1.22 MB/s
0.937 MB/s
4K QD32
1.23 MB/s
0.935 MB/s




Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message


 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2016 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .