Wednesday, November 26, 2014
Search
  
Most Popular
Hardware Reviews
Graphics Cards
WEB Reviews
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 V.3 4TB SAS 6Gb/s HDD Review
OCZ Vector 256GB SSD Review @ Custom PC Review
Gigabyte F2A85XM-D3H
NZXT Phantom 630
Auvio Bluetooth Portable Speaker Review
Corsair H90 CPU Cooler Review
BIOSTAR Hi-Fi Z77X (Intel Z77) Motherboard Review
Noctua NH-L9i Cooler Review on Technic3D
Breaking News
HP Reports Fiscal 2014 Full-Year and Fourth Quarter Results
Hitachi Wearable Device Monitors Brain Functions
Hitachi Technology Stores Digital Data In 100 Recording Layers, Data Can be Stored For 300 million Years
Sony To Provide Refunds To Users Over Misleading Ads For PlayStation Vita
Blu-ray Movie Discs Used As Templates For Improving Solar Cell Performance
PC Outlook Remains Cautious
Trade Your iPhone for BlackBerry Passport And Get $550
GreatFire.org Unblocks BBC Chinese
Home > Hardware Reviews > Graphics Cards

Thursday, March 18, 2010
Gigabyte HD5670 OC

4. FutureMark Hall Of Fame

The Futuremark benchmarks have been highly discussed among gamers and reviewers. For your information we post the results from 3DMark 05, 3DMark 06 and of course the latest 3DMark Vantage benchmarking software, which give you a rough idea of the performance of each graphics card.

According to the results, the Gigabyte HD5670 OC is positioned somewhere in the middle of the following table with a score of 15839 - not bad at all:

The Gigabyte HD5670 OC scores higher than the Nvidia GT240-based graphic cards, as you can see below in the results at the 3DMark 06 benchmark:

The 3DMark Vantage offers a a clearer view of the card's performance at various resolutions. This time the Gigabyte HD5670 OC gave almost the same performance with the the Gainward GT240. Both AMD's previous generation HD4770 as well as the newer HD5770 series are much faster regardless the selected resolution:




Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message


 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2014 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .