Thursday, February 11, 2016
Search
  
Most Popular
Hardware Reviews
Graphics Cards
ASUS STRIX R9 380X OC review
WEB Reviews
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 V.3 4TB SAS 6Gb/s HDD Review
OCZ Vector 256GB SSD Review @ Custom PC Review
Gigabyte F2A85XM-D3H
NZXT Phantom 630
Auvio Bluetooth Portable Speaker Review
Corsair H90 CPU Cooler Review
BIOSTAR Hi-Fi Z77X (Intel Z77) Motherboard Review
Noctua NH-L9i Cooler Review on Technic3D
Breaking News
Samsung Showcases Latest Monitors, TVs, Smartpwatch And Tablet At 2016 European Forum
Qualcomm Announces Three New Snapdragon Processors, Wear Platform And First Gigabit Class LTE Modem
TSMC Wins Exclusive Chip Contract For Next iPhone: report
LG Introduces Touch-Enabled Quick Phone Cover For LG G5 Smartphone
Oculus Starts Offering Discounted Computers To Early Virtual Reality Adopters
Archos 50d Oxygen Launching At MWC
Chip Makers Differientate In terms Of Equipment Investments
New Plextor M6S Plus SSDs Released
Home > Hardware Reviews > Graphics Cards

Wednesday, December 02, 2009
Gainward GT240

4. Benchmarks - FutureMark Hall Of Fame

The Futuremark benchmarks have been highly discussed among gamers and reviewers. For your information we post the results from 3DMark 05, 3DMark 06 and of course the latest 3DMark Vantage benchmarking software, which give you a rough idea of the performance of each graphics card.

As you can see below, the Gainward GT 240 has much more power than its smaller brothers, the GT210 and the GT220 series:

The 3DMark 06 also confirmed the previous findings with the we GT 240 to score much higher than the GT 220 series:

The 3DMark Vantage offers a a clearer view of the card's performance at various resolutions. The Gainward GT 240 proved to be more powerful than the 9600GT series here and is also competitive with much higher-priced graphics cards. Later on, real life gaming will unveil more on the card's strengths:




Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message


 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2016 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .