Sunday, February 07, 2016
Search
  
Most Popular
Hardware Reviews
Graphics Cards
ASUS STRIX R9 380X OC review
WEB Reviews
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 V.3 4TB SAS 6Gb/s HDD Review
OCZ Vector 256GB SSD Review @ Custom PC Review
Gigabyte F2A85XM-D3H
NZXT Phantom 630
Auvio Bluetooth Portable Speaker Review
Corsair H90 CPU Cooler Review
BIOSTAR Hi-Fi Z77X (Intel Z77) Motherboard Review
Noctua NH-L9i Cooler Review on Technic3D
Breaking News
Google Has A Gear VR Competitor In The Works: report
Sony Xperia Z5 and Xperia Z5 Compact Are Now Shipping In The U.S.
Following Outcry, Twitter's Dorsey Says Live Tweets Are Here To Stay
Samsung Files Patent For A Vein-authentication System On A Smartwatch
BlackBerry Cuts 200 Jobs To Trim Costs
Taiwan Earthquake Temporarily Suspended TSMC's And UMC's Production
Samsung Loses Memory-Chip patent Trial Against Nvidia
Twitter Suspends Accounts To Combat Extremism
Home > Hardware Reviews > Graphics Cards

Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Gainward GTX285

4. Benchmarks - FutureMark Hall Of Fame

The Futuremark benchmarks have been highly discussed between gamers and reviewers. For your information we post the results of the 3DMark 05, 3DMark 06 and of course the newly released 3DMark Vantage that gives you a rough idea of what can you expect from the tested graphics cards.

The Gainward GTX285 is slower than the Rampage700 2048MB GS and HD4870 1024GB GS products according to 3DMark 05. The 3DMark 06 benchmark did not change the classification:

The 3DMark Vantage gave a a clearer view of the card's performance at various resolutions, from the 1280x1024 and up to 1920x1200. The Gainward GTX285 gave the highest score at the 1280x1024 resolution and its performance drops almost linearly as the resolution reaches the 1920x1280. Again the Rampage700 2048GS is faster at the higher resolutions (1680x1050 and 1920x1200), mainly due the higher memory onboard.




Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message


 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2016 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .