Friday, December 09, 2016
Search
  
Most Popular
Hardware Reviews
PC Parts
Shuttle XPC Slim DS67U Barebone
Kingston DC400 960GB SSD review
Toshiba OCZ RD400 512GB M.2 PCIe SSD
Minix Neo Z83-4 Windows Mini PC review
Shuttle DH110 review
WEB Reviews
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 V.3 4TB SAS 6Gb/s HDD Review
OCZ Vector 256GB SSD Review @ Custom PC Review
Gigabyte F2A85XM-D3H
NZXT Phantom 630
Auvio Bluetooth Portable Speaker Review
Corsair H90 CPU Cooler Review
BIOSTAR Hi-Fi Z77X (Intel Z77) Motherboard Review
Noctua NH-L9i Cooler Review on Technic3D
Breaking News
Samsung To Make Chips For Tesla Cars
Google Opens its Digital Assistant to Developers
BlackBerry Unveils BlackBerry Secure For IoT Mobile Security
ARM Physical IP for TSMC 7nm Process Technology Now Available
HTC Launches Vive Studios, Debuts "Arcade Saga" Title
Radeon Software Crimson ReLive Edition Brings Support For Chill, Along With New Features
Microsoft Unveils Windows 10 for Qualcomm Chips, "Project Evo" PCs For Mixed Reality And Gaming
Samsung's First Foldable Phone May Actually Not Have A Foldable Screen
Home > Hardware Reviews > PC Parts

Thursday, February 19, 2009
Akasa Elite HDD Case

3. Tests

Let's see now some performance numbers when using the HDD conected via the the USB 2.0 and the eSATA interfaces. For our tests, we installed a WD 320GB 2.5" SATA HDD drive and connected it to the following PC:

  • CPU: Intel Core i7-920 Retail
  • Motherboard: Asus P6T Deluxe BIOS 1102
  • Memory: PatriotMemory 3x2GB PC3-12800
  • Main HDD: WD 800JD
  • Operating system: Windows VISTA x64 SP1 with all the latest updates installed

As we have mentioned, you can operate the drive, either as a USB2.0 or as an eSATA device. Normaly, the latter should perform as if you had the SATA HDD installed inside a notebook or a PC.

The drive was recognized as Generic External 2.10 drive under Windows:

Running the Full Bench test gives us an idea of the overall performance. Under the USB 2.0 mode, the drive gave a rather linear performance. Reading was done at 35MB/sec and writing was slower at 31MB/sec. The random access time was 14.4ms.

As it was expected, the drive was much faster connected through the eSATA interface. Compared to the USB 2.0 mode, here you will get almost double the performance:

The HD TunePro software more or less confirm the above findings:




Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message


 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2016 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .