Sunday, September 25, 2016
Search
  
Most Popular
Hardware Reviews
Graphics Cards
Nvidia Geforce GTX 1070 review
AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB review
WEB Reviews
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 V.3 4TB SAS 6Gb/s HDD Review
OCZ Vector 256GB SSD Review @ Custom PC Review
Gigabyte F2A85XM-D3H
NZXT Phantom 630
Auvio Bluetooth Portable Speaker Review
Corsair H90 CPU Cooler Review
BIOSTAR Hi-Fi Z77X (Intel Z77) Motherboard Review
Noctua NH-L9i Cooler Review on Technic3D
Breaking News
Snapchat Introduces 'Spectacles' Camera-equipped Glasses, Changes Company name To Snap
Nvidia GPUs Could Return To Apple Macs
Lenovo Brings Fingerprint Authenticated Payments To Laptops
Report Cites Google, Salesforce Interest For Twitter
Dalian Wanda and Sony Enters Team Up in China Movie Business
Apple Develops Amazon Echo-Style Device
ALD Technology Chosen By Samsung, LG For Flexible OLEDs
TSMC To Use Different Processes And 3D Packages Across Future Design Platforms
Home > Hardware Reviews > Graphics Cards

Tuesday, June 03, 2008
Asus 8800GTS 512 Top

4. FutureMark Hall Of Fame

The Futuremark benchmarks have been highly discussed between gamers and reviewers. For your information we post results from 3DMark 05, 3DMark 06 and of course the newly released 3DMark Vantage that gives you a rough idea of what can you expect from the tested graphics cards.

The higher core/memory/shader clocks affects the overall 3D Mark 05 and 3DMark 06 scores, compared with the XFX 8800GTS 512 Alpha Dog Edition.

Passing to 3DMark Vantage, we have a clearer view about the card's performance in various resolutions, starting from 1280x1024 and up to 1920x1200. The Asus EN8800GTS 512 Top is faster than the XFX 8800GTS 512 Alpha Dog Edition at 1280x1024 but at the highest 1920x1200 resolution, both cards performed nevertheless the same. An Nvidia 8800GTS 512MB SLI combo seems to perform very well giving very high scores.




Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message


 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2016 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .