Saturday, October 22, 2016
Most Popular
Hardware Reviews
PC Parts
Shuttle XPC Slim DS67U Barebone
Kingston DC400 960GB SSD review
Toshiba OCZ RD400 512GB M.2 PCIe SSD
Shuttle DH110 review
WEB Reviews
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 V.3 4TB SAS 6Gb/s HDD Review
OCZ Vector 256GB SSD Review @ Custom PC Review
Gigabyte F2A85XM-D3H
NZXT Phantom 630
Auvio Bluetooth Portable Speaker Review
Corsair H90 CPU Cooler Review
BIOSTAR Hi-Fi Z77X (Intel Z77) Motherboard Review
Noctua NH-L9i Cooler Review on Technic3D
Breaking News
TSMC, GlobalFoundries/Samsung To Present Their 7nm CMOS Platforms At IEDM
Hon Hai Gains Apple Mac Orders From Quanta
AT&T In Advanced Talks With Time Warner On Merger
LG's Next Flagship G6 Smartphone Won't be Modular
Samsung to Exchange Galaxy Note 7 with New Galaxy S8
Qualcomm Said to Be Near A Deal With NXP
AMD Revenue Forecast Falls Short of Estimates
Microsoft Cloud Strength Highlights First Quarter Results
Home > Hardware Reviews > PC Parts

Wednesday, September 19, 2007
PC2-6400 SO-DIMM Roundup

3. Test Setup

In order to test the memory modules, we used two different laptops with different chipsets and operating systems:

- Asus A6JA (i945PM) - Windows XP SP2

- Asus A7s (i965PM) Windows VISTA 32bit

For benchmarking, we used:

  • Sisoft Sandra 2007 SP1
  • RightMark Memory Analyzer v3.70
  • ScienceMark 2.0 Memory Benchmark
  • Pov-Ray v3.70 Beta15
  • SuperPI XS Mod v1.50

Note that both memory modules didn't work at the manufacturer "claimed" speed of 400MHz. However, we cannot blame the memory manufacturers since both the Intel i945PM and Intel Santa Rosa 965GM don't support 800MHz memory modules. To be exact, Intel Santa Rosa supports 800MHz FSB but "only" at 667MHz memory speeds. In other words, both memory modules won't offer much performance improvement compared with "normal" DDR2-5300 memory modules. Perhaps the next generation of laptops will support 800MHz for memory so that performance can be improved significantly.

Another issue we encountered was the fact that the 2GB OCZ DDR2-800 module was only recognized as 1GB. After talking with OCZ, we believe that due to our modules being an early sample release, the sticker on our modules had been mis-configured, but this is not a major issue, the retail kits will be correctly labeled as 2GB :-)

We post only comparison results from the Asus A6JA. We benchmarked all modules under Windows VISTA but didn't see any major performance differences. In any case, the tested memory modules worked as follows:

Real Memory Speed
333.50 MHz
333.50 MHz

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2016 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .