Monday, November 20, 2017
Search
  
Most Popular
Hardware Reviews
PC Parts
Intel Core i7-8700K and Core i5-8400 benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7980XE and Core i9-7960X benchmarks
Crucial BX300 480GB SSD review
WEB Reviews
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 V.3 4TB SAS 6Gb/s HDD Review
OCZ Vector 256GB SSD Review @ Custom PC Review
Gigabyte F2A85XM-D3H
NZXT Phantom 630
Auvio Bluetooth Portable Speaker Review
Corsair H90 CPU Cooler Review
BIOSTAR Hi-Fi Z77X (Intel Z77) Motherboard Review
Noctua NH-L9i Cooler Review on Technic3D
Breaking News
GPU Shipments in Q3: AMD Increased 8 percent, Nvidia Increased 30 Percent
Samsung Says New SZ985 Z-NAND SSD Offers Ultra-Low Latency and High Throughput
AMD EPYC Processor Powers the New HPE Gen10 Server
Volvo to Supply Thousands of Self-driving Cars to Uber
Marvell Technology to Buy Cavium for $6 billion
Honor 7X is Official Coming with a FullView Display
Samsung Forecast to Top Intel as Larger Semiconductor Supplier in 2017
Samsung, LG Electronics Cut TV Prices for Black Friday
Home > Hardware Reviews > PC Parts

Wednesday, May 30, 2007
SO-DIMM 2GB PC2-5300 Roundup

3. Test Results - XP

Under Windows XP, we tested the performance of all possible combinations. What was apparent was that the 3D Mark 06 score was not greatly affected (only one point should be considered as minimal):

But other, synthetic benchmarks were affected. Comparing the 2GB Crucial and 2GB SuperTalent PC2-5300, in some tests Crucial was faster, while in others SuperTalent. Looking at the specs, the SuperTalent has a small advantage due to the fact that is has 5-5-5-13 timings, while the Crucial has 5-5-5-15:




Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message


 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2017 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .