Thursday, October 27, 2016
Most Popular
Hardware Reviews
PC Parts
Shuttle XPC Slim DS67U Barebone
Kingston DC400 960GB SSD review
Toshiba OCZ RD400 512GB M.2 PCIe SSD
Shuttle DH110 review
Minix Neo Z83-4 Windows Mini PC review
WEB Reviews
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 V.3 4TB SAS 6Gb/s HDD Review
OCZ Vector 256GB SSD Review @ Custom PC Review
Gigabyte F2A85XM-D3H
NZXT Phantom 630
Auvio Bluetooth Portable Speaker Review
Corsair H90 CPU Cooler Review
BIOSTAR Hi-Fi Z77X (Intel Z77) Motherboard Review
Noctua NH-L9i Cooler Review on Technic3D
Breaking News
Twitter Announces Restructuring and Headcount Reduction
Qualcomm Is Buying NXP Semiconductors in A $38.1B Deal
Fujitsu Launches First 4 Mbit ReRAM
Smartphone Shipments Up 1 Percent Year over Year in Third Quarter Despite Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Recall
Nintendo To Hold Official Nintendo Switch Presentation, Hints On More Accessories, Software, VR Support
Weak Smartphone Sales Keep LG Electronics's Third-quarter Profit Down
Samsung Third Quarter Profit Drops Amid Note 7 Phone Fiasco
Fujitsu and Lenovo Confirm Talks Over PC Cooperation
Home > Hardware Reviews > PC Parts

Wednesday, May 30, 2007
SO-DIMM 2GB PC2-5300 Roundup

3. Test Results - XP

Under Windows XP, we tested the performance of all possible combinations. What was apparent was that the 3D Mark 06 score was not greatly affected (only one point should be considered as minimal):

But other, synthetic benchmarks were affected. Comparing the 2GB Crucial and 2GB SuperTalent PC2-5300, in some tests Crucial was faster, while in others SuperTalent. Looking at the specs, the SuperTalent has a small advantage due to the fact that is has 5-5-5-13 timings, while the Crucial has 5-5-5-15:

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2016 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .