Tuesday, February 09, 2016
Search
  
Most Popular
Hardware Reviews
PC Parts
Samsung 950 Pro M.2 512GB NVMe review
OCZ Vector 180 480GB SSD review
Crucial BX200 960GB SSD review
WEB Reviews
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 V.3 4TB SAS 6Gb/s HDD Review
OCZ Vector 256GB SSD Review @ Custom PC Review
Gigabyte F2A85XM-D3H
NZXT Phantom 630
Auvio Bluetooth Portable Speaker Review
Corsair H90 CPU Cooler Review
BIOSTAR Hi-Fi Z77X (Intel Z77) Motherboard Review
Noctua NH-L9i Cooler Review on Technic3D
Breaking News
French Data Protection Authority Says Facebook Should Stop Collecting Non-User Data
Verizon Expores Yahoo Deal Options: report
Kingston Buys USB Technology and Assets of IronKey from Imation
LG'S Flagship SIGNATURE OLED TV Now Available In The U.S.
Imagination Tech CEO Steps Down As Company Reports Losses
Google Has A Gear VR Competitor In The Works: report
Sony Xperia Z5 and Xperia Z5 Compact Are Now Shipping In The U.S.
Following Outcry, Twitter's Dorsey Says Live Tweets Are Here To Stay
Home > Hardware Reviews > PC Parts

Wednesday, May 30, 2007
SO-DIMM 2GB PC2-5300 Roundup

3. Test Results - XP

Under Windows XP, we tested the performance of all possible combinations. What was apparent was that the 3D Mark 06 score was not greatly affected (only one point should be considered as minimal):

But other, synthetic benchmarks were affected. Comparing the 2GB Crucial and 2GB SuperTalent PC2-5300, in some tests Crucial was faster, while in others SuperTalent. Looking at the specs, the SuperTalent has a small advantage due to the fact that is has 5-5-5-13 timings, while the Crucial has 5-5-5-15:




Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message


 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2016 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .