Tuesday, January 23, 2018
Search
  
Most Popular
Hardware Reviews
PC Parts
Intel Core i7-8700K and Core i5-8400 benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7980XE and Core i9-7960X benchmarks
Crucial BX300 480GB SSD review
WEB Reviews
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 V.3 4TB SAS 6Gb/s HDD Review
OCZ Vector 256GB SSD Review @ Custom PC Review
Gigabyte F2A85XM-D3H
NZXT Phantom 630
Auvio Bluetooth Portable Speaker Review
Corsair H90 CPU Cooler Review
BIOSTAR Hi-Fi Z77X (Intel Z77) Motherboard Review
Noctua NH-L9i Cooler Review on Technic3D
Breaking News
Report: Apple iPhone X Was the Best-shipping Smartphone Over the Holiday Season
Engineers Design Artificial Synapse for Neuromorphic Chips
JDI Develops Transparent Glass-based Capacitive Fingerprint Sensor
Tesla's Musk Will Be paid Only When Company Has a Profit
Samsung, LG Comment on US Safeguard on Washers
LG Display Q4 Profit Fell on Low Panel Prices, New OLED Investments
Acer Showcases New Chromebooks And Chromebox Devices
Intel: Stop Installing Security Patches Until Further Notice
Home > Hardware Reviews > PC Parts

Wednesday, May 30, 2007
SO-DIMM 2GB PC2-5300 Roundup

3. Test Results - XP

Under Windows XP, we tested the performance of all possible combinations. What was apparent was that the 3D Mark 06 score was not greatly affected (only one point should be considered as minimal):

But other, synthetic benchmarks were affected. Comparing the 2GB Crucial and 2GB SuperTalent PC2-5300, in some tests Crucial was faster, while in others SuperTalent. Looking at the specs, the SuperTalent has a small advantage due to the fact that is has 5-5-5-13 timings, while the Crucial has 5-5-5-15:




Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message


 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2018 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .