Thursday, July 24, 2014
Search
  
Most Popular
Hardware Reviews
PC Parts
Toshiba HG6 256GB 2.5-inch SSD review
Shuttle Omninas KS10 review
Crucial MX100 512GB SSD review
WEB Reviews
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 V.3 4TB SAS 6Gb/s HDD Review
OCZ Vector 256GB SSD Review @ Custom PC Review
Gigabyte F2A85XM-D3H
NZXT Phantom 630
Auvio Bluetooth Portable Speaker Review
Corsair H90 CPU Cooler Review
BIOSTAR Hi-Fi Z77X (Intel Z77) Motherboard Review
Noctua NH-L9i Cooler Review on Technic3D
Breaking News
Sony Settles 2011 PSN Hacking Case
Sony Xperia Z3 Specs Leaked
Swatch Denies Working with Apple on iWatch
Vuzix And Lenovo Launch M100 Smart Glasses Product
Google Implemented "Right To Be Forgotten" Ruling Inadequately, EC says
Researchers Create Ultra-dense Memory Using Conventional Methods
Facebook Profit Doubles
Qualcomm's Profit Hurt by Dispute Over China Royalties
Home > Hardware Reviews > PC Parts

Tuesday, May 15, 2007
Corsair TurboFlash 1Gb

3. The Tests

- Tests

In order to test our Corsair TurboFlash USB 1.0GB drive, we used two systems:

  • Biostar TA690GAM2 with AMD Athlon X2 4600+
  • 2x1GB Crucial PC2-8000@400Hz (4-4-4-8)
  • WD 36GB Raptor
  • Windows Vista Ultimate 32bit

And the second system is based on the Intel C2D

  • Shuttle SD32G2 with Intel C2D E6300
  • 2x1GB Crucial PC2-8500@400MHz (4-4-4-8)
  • WD 36GB Raptor
  • Windows XP SP2 with all latest updated installed

Under Windows XP, we were able to test the RAW performance of the Corsair TurboFlash 1GB USB Stick

Below are the test results. As we can see, an almost flat line in the performance of the device for both reading and writing functions.

The USB stick was able to read data at 35MB/sec, while its writing performance was somewhat slower at 15MB/sec.

Under Windows Vista, we used Sisoft Sandra 2007 XI SP2 for the two available tests:

Physical Disk Benchmark

Flash Disk Benchmark




Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message


 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2014 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .