Wednesday, August 27, 2014
Search
  
Most Popular
Hardware Reviews
Graphics Cards
WEB Reviews
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 V.3 4TB SAS 6Gb/s HDD Review
OCZ Vector 256GB SSD Review @ Custom PC Review
Gigabyte F2A85XM-D3H
NZXT Phantom 630
Auvio Bluetooth Portable Speaker Review
Corsair H90 CPU Cooler Review
BIOSTAR Hi-Fi Z77X (Intel Z77) Motherboard Review
Noctua NH-L9i Cooler Review on Technic3D
Breaking News
Nero 2015 is Coming At IFA
LaCie Ships the 48 TB Thunderbolt 2 Storage Solution
ALCATEL ONETOUCH Launches New Affordable Smartphones
ZOTAC Debuts the ZBOX PI320 pico
Dropbox Now Offers 1TB Pro plan for 10 Dollars
HTC Reveals Entry-level Desire 510 Powered By a 64-bit Processor
Archos To Showcase Windows And Android Devices At IFA
Larger iPad Coming Next Year
Home > Hardware Reviews > Graphics Cards

Wednesday, January 04, 2006
Benchmarking update

4. Quake 4

In a desperate war for Earth's survival, against an unrelenting alien enemy, the only way to defeat them is to become one of them. Armed with advanced weaponry and vehicles and aided by an elite squad of marines, you take the battle to the heart of the Strogg home planet and become Earth's only hope for victory.

Quake 4 is a First Person Shooter developed by Ravensoft, based on the Doom 3 engine, and the graphics and gameplay certainly reflect that fact. For those who really hated the one-way corridors of Doom 3, new outdoor areas have been added to the game. The feeling however, still remains the same as these areas are quite small-scale, contrary to what other games have to offer.

 

- Benchmark Settings

As Quake 4 includes no default benchmark, we decided to go with another publicly available demo to measure performance. What we chose is a demo from HWSpirit, which involves a small outdoor scene followed by a long indoor combat. As preloading the stage once again failed miserably and the average framerate varied a lot, the second time we ran the demo, we ran it twice every time we restarted the game and measured only the second run.

The resolutions we used are 800x600, 1024x768, 1280x1024 and 1600x1200. We measured performance with and without Anti-aliasing.

You can see most cards performed fairly well, offering an average framerate above 35 under all resolutions. The one that stands out is the X600XT which represents the older generation mid-range cards.

Now enabling anti-aliasing begins the nightmare for the N6600GT cards. Even SLI doesn't help in this case. In fact, SLI brought out worse performance than running the game with one card. Maybe a driver update is needed from NVidia to set things straight. None of the 7800GT based cards faced any difficulty, rendering the benchmark and all managed to deliver a steady framerate above 50.




Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message


 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2014 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .