Monday, July 28, 2014
Search
  
Most Popular
Hardware Reviews
PC Parts
Toshiba HG6 256GB 2.5-inch SSD review
Shuttle Omninas KS10 review
Crucial MX100 512GB SSD review
WEB Reviews
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 V.3 4TB SAS 6Gb/s HDD Review
OCZ Vector 256GB SSD Review @ Custom PC Review
Gigabyte F2A85XM-D3H
NZXT Phantom 630
Auvio Bluetooth Portable Speaker Review
Corsair H90 CPU Cooler Review
BIOSTAR Hi-Fi Z77X (Intel Z77) Motherboard Review
Noctua NH-L9i Cooler Review on Technic3D
Breaking News
Motorola Said To Make Google's Next Phablet
Apple-Beats Deal Cleared By Europe
New Ultrastar SAS Solid-state Drives Offer Up To 1.6TB Capacities
PNY Releases Coin Sized Micro M2 Flash Drive
Samsung Delays Tizen Smartphone Launch
Logitech Announces Budget UC Headset
Amazon Offers New 3D Printed Products Store
Bose Says Beats Electronics Infringe its Patents
Home > Hardware Reviews > PC Parts

Monday, November 15, 2004
MSI 915G Combo

3. Performance

03 - Performance

For testing this motherboard we used 3 benchmarks. One concerning overall performance (PCMark04) and two for checking out the integrated graphics processor (Aquamark03, 3DMark01). The later two are known for their dependence on the CPU processor so there's no fear of us concentrating solely on the GPU.

PCMark04

PCMark04 is an application-based benchmark and a premium tool for measuring overall PC performance. It uses portions of real applications instead of including very large applications or using specifically created code. This allows PCMark04 to be a smaller installation as well as to report very accurate results.

 
Intel 915G
PCMarks
3949
File Compression
4.1 MB/s
File Encryption
55.0 MB/s
File Decompression
35.9 MB/s
Image Processing
14.6 MPixels/s
Virus Scanning
2576.2 MB/s
Grammar Check
2.1 KB/s
File Decryption
85.7 MB/s
Audio Conversion
2340.6 KB/s
Web Page Rendering
5.3 Pages/s
WMV Video Compression
51.3 FPS
DivX Video Compression
65.6 FPS
Physics Calculation and 3D
80.6 FPS
Graphics Memory - 64 lines
680.5 FPS

 

3DMark01

The 915G's performance was a little better that the performance we got from the ATI IGP9100 and not so far away from the X300 which is quite interesting.

Aquamark03

Aquamark03 is a much more serious benchmark than Futuremark's outdated 3DMark01. That's why the difference between the Intel 915G and a "real" VGA card is more obvious. In addition to that, Intel's chipset couldn't keep up with the IGP9100 and yielded the very low score of 8727.




Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message


 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2014 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .