Thursday, October 27, 2016
Most Popular
Hardware Reviews
PC Parts
Shuttle XPC Slim DS67U Barebone
Kingston DC400 960GB SSD review
Toshiba OCZ RD400 512GB M.2 PCIe SSD
Shuttle DH110 review
Minix Neo Z83-4 Windows Mini PC review
WEB Reviews
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 V.3 4TB SAS 6Gb/s HDD Review
OCZ Vector 256GB SSD Review @ Custom PC Review
Gigabyte F2A85XM-D3H
NZXT Phantom 630
Auvio Bluetooth Portable Speaker Review
Corsair H90 CPU Cooler Review
BIOSTAR Hi-Fi Z77X (Intel Z77) Motherboard Review
Noctua NH-L9i Cooler Review on Technic3D
Breaking News
Twitter Announces Restructuring and Headcount Reduction
Qualcomm Is Buying NXP Semiconductors in A $38.1B Deal
Fujitsu Launches First 4 Mbit ReRAM
Smartphone Shipments Up 1 Percent Year over Year in Third Quarter Despite Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Recall
Nintendo To Hold Official Nintendo Switch Presentation, Hints On More Accessories, Software, VR Support
Weak Smartphone Sales Keep LG Electronics's Third-quarter Profit Down
Samsung Third Quarter Profit Drops Amid Note 7 Phone Fiasco
Fujitsu and Lenovo Confirm Talks Over PC Cooperation
Home > Hardware Reviews > PC Parts

Tuesday, September 21, 2004
AMD Athlon 64 3800+

3. System Specifications

AMD Athlon 64 3800+ - Page 3

Here's a list of what we used to test the 3800+ processor:

System Specifications:
CPU: AMD 3800+(2.4GHz)CPU
Cooler: Zalman CNPS7000A-Cu
Motherboard: A8V Deluxe
Power supply: Levicom 500 Watt
Memory: 2x OCZ DDR-SDRAM PC3200 – 512 MB (dual channel)
VGA: Sapphire 9800pro
Hard Disk Drive: WD800JD 80GB 7200RPM
OS: Windows XP Pro SP2 & Windows XP x64 Edition SP1
Drivers: 4.8 Catalyst & 64-bit Catalyst beta
DirectX: v9.0b

Benchmarks & Applications used

  • Sisoft Sandra 2004
  • Prime95
  • PcMark04
  • DVD Shrink 3.2
  • 3DMark03
  • Far cry v1.1
  • Unreal Tournament 2004
  • CPU-Z

As we mentioned earlier, apart from the recently released Service Pack 2 for Windows XP, we used a Windows XP 64-bit edition beta, or as Microsoft likes to call it, Windows XP Professional x64 Edition Customer Preview, to test our hardware. We were hoping to see a few improvements or changes but it seems not much has changed after all. For the tests we installed a beta version of the 64-bit ATI Catalyst drivers. We were pleasantly surprised to discover than not only the drivers are quite stable, but also on some benchmarks, we even got better results from the 32-bit platform. Of course, we noticed some minor bugs, especially in the 2-D acceleration area, but after all, it's still a beta version, isn't it?

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2016 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .