Wednesday, April 24, 2024
Search
English
Optical Storage
Graphics Cards
General Computing
PC Parts
Digital Cameras
Consumer Electronics
Games
Mobiles
All News Categories
Older News
Optical Storage
Graphics Cards
General Computing
PC Parts
Digital Cameras
Consumer Electronics
Games
Cooling Systems
Mobiles
Software Reviews
Reviews Around the Web
Technology Previews
Essays
Interviews
Tech Views
Glossary
FAQ
Guides/How-To's
Firmware
Drivers
BIOS
Software
Media Tests
Drive Comparisons
DVD Media Formats
All Forums
Become Member
Today's Posts
Popular Topics
In-House
Optical Storage
Optical Storage Software
General
Consumer Electronics
Other
News Around The Web
Advertise
Links
Jobs
Site Map
News/Reviews Feed
Submit News
Polls
Competitions
Users' Privacy
Contact Us
About
Home
|
News
|
Reviews
|
Articles
|
Guides
|
Download
|
Expert Area
|
Forum
|
Site Info
Tuesday, July 19, 2011
ITC Says Kodak Did Not Infringe Apple's Patents
You are sending an email that contains the article
and a private message for your recipient(s).
Your Name:
Your e-mail:
* Required!
Recipient (e-mail):
*
Subject:
*
Introductory Message:
HTML/Text
(Photo: Yes/No)
(At the moment, only Text is allowed...)
Message Text:
The International Trade Commission
on Monday upheld
a decision by one of its judges that Eastman Kodak did not infringe Apple Inc patents for digital cameras.
The comission will not review the presiding administrative law judge?s final initial determination issued on May 12, 2011, finding no violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. § 1337, in this investigation.
Apple had filed a complaint with the ITC in May 2010, accusing Kodak of infringing patents for making digital cameras and related software. The ITC administrative law judge said two months ago that Kodak did not infringe the patents.
Kodak settled similar patent disputes with LG and Samsung in 2009 and 2010, respectively. The two South Korean consumer electronics makers agreed to license Kodak's technology.
Home
|
News
|
All News
|
Reviews
|
Articles
|
Guides
|
Download
|
Expert Area
|
Forum
|
Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ -
CDRINFO.COM
1998-2024 - All rights reserved
-
Privacy policy
-
Contact Us
.