Tuesday, June 18, 2013
Search
English
Optical Storage
Graphics Cards
General Computing
PC Parts
Digital Cameras
Consumer Electronics
Games
Mobiles
All News Categories
Older News
Optical Storage
Graphics Cards
General Computing
PC Parts
Digital Cameras
Consumer Electronics
Games
Cooling Systems
Mobiles
Software Reviews
Reviews Around the Web
Technology Previews
Essays
Interviews
Tech Views
Glossary
FAQ
Guides/How-To's
Firmware
Drivers
BIOS
Software
Media Tests
Drive Comparisons
DVD Media Formats
All Forums
Become Member
Today's Posts
Popular Topics
In-House
Optical Storage
Optical Storage Software
General
Consumer Electronics
Other
News Around The Web
Advertise
Links
Jobs
Site Map
News/Reviews Feed
Submit News
Polls
Competitions
Users' Privacy
Contact Us
About
Home
|
News
|
Reviews
|
Articles
|
Guides
|
Download
|
Expert Area
|
Forum
|
Site Info
Tuesday, May 15, 2007
AMD Opteron Processor Faster Than Xeon in SQL Database Test
You are sending an email that contains the article
and a private message for your recipient(s).
Your Name:
Your e-mail:
* Required!
Recipient (e-mail):
*
Subject:
*
Introductory Message:
HTML/Text
(Photo: Yes/No)
(At the moment, only Text is allowed...)
Message Text:
An AMD Opteron processor-based server delivered up to 6 percent higher throughput when compared to an Intel Xeon (Woodcrest) based server while processing SQL Transactions against a Relational Database, according to Neal Nelson & Associates, a Chicago area computer performance consulting firm.
"These test results seem to support recent speculation that the AMD Opteron processor architecture is superior to the Xeon architecture for applications with a large code footprint and complex execution profile" observed Neal Nelson, president of the independent consulting group.
The test was run with the Neal Nelson SQL Transaction Benchmark which generates traffic from up to 500 simultaneous World Wide Web clients and submits the transactions to a server system. It stresses all major sub-systems in a computer's architecture including memory access, inter-process communication, context switching, disk I/O and network I/O.
The two servers in this test were configured with the same clock speed and memory size. They were tested with the same disk drives and operating systems which had been loaded from the same media. The machines were set up with the same system tunables and ran the same application code which had been compiled by the same compiler with the same compiler options.
In the chart below you can see a graph of the data.
Home
|
News
|
All News
|
Reviews
|
Articles
|
Guides
|
Download
|
Expert Area
|
Forum
|
Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ -
CDRINFO.COM
1998-2013 - All rights reserved
-
Privacy policy
-
Contact Us
.