Monday, March 30, 2015
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
Apple Offers Trade-in Program For Android, Blackberry And Windows Phones
Kingston Releases New USB 3,0 Media Reader
Amazon Starts Offering Home Services
Alibaba Signs Deal With BMG
GIGABYTE Releases ARM Server Solutions
ASUS Transformer Book Chi Available for Preorders
GitHub Under Denial-of-service cyber Attack
LG Launches New AKA Smartphones Globally
Active Discussions
how to copy and move data files to dvd-rw
cdrw trouble
Need serious help!!!!
burning
nvidia 6200 review
Hello
Burning Multimedia in track 0
I'm lazy. Please help.
 Home > News > Optical Storage > Decisio...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Tuesday, December 16, 2003
Decision on Philips CD-R/RW patents unlikely to be reversed


GigaStorage and Princo, the two Taiwanese makers accused by Philips Electronics of infringing on six CD-R/CD-RW patents, think the US International Trade Commission (ITC) would not reverse the October 24 findings of a US administrative law judge.

Philips US alleged that the two Taiwanese companies had infringed on six patents held by Philips regarding CD-R and CD-RW drive manufacturing technology. A US administrative law judge on October 24 decided that the patents were valid and infringed upon but not enforceable due to patent misuse.

In response to a request from Philips, the ITC on December 11 announced that it would conduct a review, with a final decision to be reached in February or March.

According to Eddie Fong, general manager of the Taiwan office of Philips Intellectual Property & Standards, the ITC’s review means that it will specifically re-examine the patent misuse by Philips. In the meantime, Philips will maintain its licensing policies to protect the interests of the CD-R/CD-RW drive makers that pay royalties to the company.

However, GigaStorage and Princo interpret the ITC review in a different way. Misuse is use of a patent right beyond the lawful scope rather than simply mistaken use of the right and therefore the owner is not entitled to enforce the patent or recover any damage for infringement, the two companies argued. Philips has the right to express its dissent to the judgment by asking for a review by the ITC, but this is not a substantial re-examination, the two companies emphasized. Based on precedents, it is unlikely that a result of a two-year process would be reversed after a two-month review, the two companies pointed out.


Previous
Next
TEAC America introduces 8X DVD+R/RW DVD recorder        All News        TEAC America introduces 8X DVD+R/RW DVD recorder
TEAC America introduces 8X DVD+R/RW DVD recorder     Optical Storage News      TEAC America introduces 8X DVD+R/RW DVD recorder

Source Link Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
Philips Fidelio NC1L Headphones Go battery-free When Connected to Your iOS Device
TP Vision To Integrate Android into Philips TVs
Philips and Nintendo Resolve Patent Disputes
Philips 272G5DYEB 27-Inch G-SYNC Monitor launching Soon
Philips to Appeal $467 Million Patent Infringement Lawsuit
Philips Expands Its Series Of Ultra HD TVs Powered by Android
New Philips Hue Beyond Combines Functionality And Ambient Lighting for Home
Philips to Create New Lumileds and Automotive Lighting Businesses Company
Philips and Salesforce.com To Deliver Cloud-based Healthcare Information Technology
EU To Fine Philips, Infineon And Samsung
Philips to Sell WOOX Innovations to Gibson
Philips Announces Its 2014 TV Lineup

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2015 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .