Sunday, April 26, 2015
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
Russian Hackers Accessed Obama's Emails
LG Display Leads The OLED Market
China Telecom To Sell Phones With Alibaba
SK Hynix To Start Production Of 36-Layer 3D NAND Flash Chips
Apple Watch Available In Select Stores
Comcast Abandons Time Warner Cable Acquisition Bid
Luxottica To Release Hi-tech Glasses Powered By Intel
Toshiba Starts Mass Production of 13 Megapixel CMOS Image Sensor
Active Discussions
menu making
roxio issues with xp pro
How to burn a backup copy of The Frozen Throne
Help make DVDInfoPro better with dvdinfomantis!!!
Question about nero
Copied dvd's say blank in computer only
Optiarc AD-7260S review
cdrw trouble
 Home > News > Optical Storage > Morpheu...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Wednesday, September 17, 2003
Morpheus fights entertainment industry appeal


StreamCast Networks, developer of the Morpheus peer-to-peer (P2P) software, today filed its brief in a closely-watched appeal that may determine how much copyright owners will control the development and use of new technologies.

In April 2003, StreamCast and fellow P2P software maker Grokster won a landmark victory against 28 entertainment companies. A federal court declared that the entertainment companies could not shut down P2P software makers for the copyright infringements of P2P software users when the software has significant legitimate uses. Examples of legitimate uses include sharing the music of artists like Janis Ian and the many others who permit sharing of live music, the works of Shakespeare, NASA photographs, films in the Prelinger archive, and other public domain materials.

The court ruled that the Morpheus software was no different from a VCR or photocopier, relying on a 1984 Supreme Court decision determining that Sony could not be held responsible for copyright infringement by users of the Betamax VCR.

The entertainment companies have appealed the case to the federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco.

"MGM v. Grokster is about whether copyright owners have the right to veto new technologies and stifle innovation," said Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Senior Staff Attorney Fred von Lohmann. "All innovators have a great deal at stake in the conflict over P2P software."

EFF, along with co-counsel Charles Baker of the Austin, TX firm of Munsch, Hardt, Kopf & Harr, and StreamCast in-house General Counsel Matthew A. Neco, represent StreamCast in the MGM v. Grokster case.

The court has not yet scheduled oral argument on the case.


Previous
Next
Ulead licenses DivX® video compression technology to complement video editing product line in OEM channel        All News        Ulead licenses DivX® video compression technology to complement video editing product line in OEM channel
Ulead licenses DivX® video compression technology to complement video editing product line in OEM channel     Optical Storage News      Ulead licenses DivX® video compression technology to complement video editing product line in OEM channel

Source Link Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
EFF Launches Free Certificate Authority To Increase Encrypted Internet Traffic
EFF Tests Tool That Stops Ad Tracking
EFF Sues for Information on Electronic Surveillance Systems
MPAA Sues P2P Search Sites
Google Releases Desktop 3
Secret Code 'Traces Copies'
Electronic Frontier Foundation defends alleged filesharer
Why the RIAA's "Amnesty" offer is a sham
California supreme court upholds free speech in DVD case
File-sharers fight legal moves
Electronic Frontier Foundation asks Copyright Office to allow consumer CD/DVD uses
Electronic Frontier Foundation launches file sharing ads

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2015 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .