Friday, August 22, 2014
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
German Regulator Will Pursue Complaint Against Publishers
IBM Tries To Strengthen Its Presence In China With Local Vendor Deal
Demand For iPhone 6 Screens Add Perssure To Supply Chain
Intel Highlights Its Wireless Computing Plans
Ouya Parners With Xiaomi On Games
Sony Offers New Smart Tennis Sensor
Microsoft to Announce Windows 9 on September Event: report
Acer Unveils New Chromebox CXI and Chromebook 11
Active Discussions
help questions structure DVDR
Made video, won't play back easily
Questions durability monitor LCD
Questions fungus CD/DVD Media, Some expert engineer in optical media can help me?
CD, DVD and Blu-ray burning for Android in development
IBM supercharges Power servers with graphics chips
Werner Vogels: four cloud computing trends for 2014
Video editing software.
 Home > News > General Computing > Google ...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Friday, September 27, 2013
Google To Face Suit Over Scanning of Messages in Gmail


A federal judge in San Jose, CA., today rejected Google's claims that wiretapping laws do not apply to its Gmail business and that Google must face a lawsuit for illegally opening and reading the contents of email sent through its Gmail service.

In rejecting all but two of the Internet giant?s motions to dismiss a class action suit, Judge Lucy Koh ruled that reading emails is not a necessary part of Google's business operations and that California's Invasion of Privacy Laws apply to opening and reading online communications without consent.

"Google's alleged interceptions are neither instrumental to the provision of email services, nor are they an incidental effect of providing these services. The Court therefore finds that Plaintiffs have plausibly alleged that the interceptions fall outside Google's ordinary course of business," wrote Judge Koh.

Judge Koh also found that the Google's Terms of Service and Privacy Polices did not inform users about the Gmail interceptions. She wrote:

"The Court finds, however, that those policies did not explicitly notify Plaintiffs that Google would intercept users' emails for the purposes of creating user profiles or providing targeted advertising ...

"The Court therefore finds that a reasonable Gmail user who read the Privacy Policies would not have necessarily understood that her emails were being intercepted to create user profiles or to provide targeted advertisements. Accordingly, the Court finds that it cannot conclude at this phase that the new policies demonstrate that Gmail user Plaintiffs consented to the interceptions."

Judge Koh gave the plaintiffs permission to amend and re-file the two claims she dismissed.

Google says it automatically scans emails to target advertising based on words that appear in Gmail messages but says that machines, not people, do the scanning.

"We're disappointed in this decision and are considering our options," Google said. "Automated scanning lets us provide Gmail users with security and spam protection, as well as great features."


Previous
Next
Intel Web-TV Service Plans Changed        All News        Intel Invests In Google Glass Rival
Intel Web-TV Service Plans Changed     General Computing News      Intel Invests In Google Glass Rival

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
German Regulator Will Pursue Complaint Against Publishers
Google Buys JetPac
Google Releases Fit SDK, Special Version Of Android L
Google To Rank Websites with HTTPS Higher
Google and Barnes & Noble Take On Amazon
Google To Unveil Instagram Competitor
Google's Ambitious Secret Barge Project Was Scarped
Google To Show Ratings to Search-Results Ads
Google Does Not Confirm to $1 Billion Acquisition Of Twitch
Google Implemented "Right To Be Forgotten" Ruling Inadequately, EC says
European Regulators May Need Extra Concessions From Google
Google Profit And Revenue Jump

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2014 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .