Tuesday, July 22, 2014
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
European Regulators May Need Extra Concessions From Google
Apple Granted Patent for Smartwatch
New Intel Solid-State Drive Pro 2500 Series Packs SK Hynix Flash And Brings Trusted Security Features
Alliance Storage Technologies Releases Enterprise Class Cloud-Integrated Storage Solution
NVIDIA Launches Shield Tablet For Gamers
AOC u3477Pqu 34-Inch WQHD Monitor Announced
ADATA Launches XPG V3 DDR3 Memory For Overclockers
Licensing Fees Drive ARM's Profit
Active Discussions
help questions structure DVDR
Made video, won't play back easily
Questions durability monitor LCD
Questions fungus CD/DVD Media, Some expert engineer in optical media can help me?
CD, DVD and Blu-ray burning for Android in development
IBM supercharges Power servers with graphics chips
Werner Vogels: four cloud computing trends for 2014
Video editing software.
 Home > News > General Computing > Apple F...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Wednesday, July 10, 2013
Apple Found Guilty in Ebooks Conspiracy Case


A judge Wednesday found Apple guilty of a price-fixing conspiracy for electronic books, saying the company "conspired to restrain trade" with publishers to boost the price of ebooks.

The decision could reshape how books are sold on the Internet.

On April 11, 2012, the Department Of Justice filed a civil antitrust lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Apple and five book publishers (Hachette Book Group (USA), HarperCollins Publishers L.L.C., Holtzbrinck Publishers LLC, which does business as Macmillan, Penguin Group (USA) Inc. and Simon & Schuster Inc.) for conspiring to end e-book retailers' freedom to compete on price by taking control of pricing from e-book retailers and increasing the prices that consumers paid for e-books.

At the same time that it filed the lawsuit, the department reached settlements with three of the publishers - Hachette, HarperCollins and Simon & Schuster. The department also settled with Penguin on Dec. 18, 2012, and with Macmillan on Feb. 8, 2013. Under the settlements, each publisher was required to terminate agreements that prevented e-book retailers from lowering the prices at which they sell e-books to consumers and to allow for retail price competition in renegotiated e-book distribution agreements.

The department's trial against Apple, which was overseen by Judge Denise Cote, began on June 3, 2013. The trial lasted for three weeks, with closing arguments taking place on June 20, 2013.

Judge Denise Cote said in her opinion that "Apple is liable here for facilitating and encouraging the Publisher Defendants' collective, illegal restraint of trade." She ordered a new hearing to determine damages. The Judge added the conspiracy resulted in prices for some e-books rising to $12.99 or $14.99, when Amazon had sold for $9.99.

"The plaintiffs have shown that the publisher defendants conspired with each other to eliminate retail price competition in order to raise e-book prices, and that Apple played a central role in facilitating and executing that conspiracy," Cote said.

"Without Apple's orchestration of this conspiracy, it would not have succeeded as it did in the spring of 2010," she added.

Apple claims that it did not conspireto fix ebook pricing and plans to appeal the judge's decision.

"This result is a victory for millions of consumers who choose to read books electronically. After carefully weighing the evidence, the court agreed with the Justice Department and 33 state attorneys general that executives at the highest levels of Apple orchestrated a conspiracy with five major publishers - Hachette, HarperCollins, Macmillan, Penguin and Simon & Schuster - to raise e-book prices. Through today's court decision and previous settlements with five major publishers, consumers are again benefitting from retail price competition and paying less for their e-books," said Assistant Attorney General Bill Baer in charge of the Department of Justice's Antitrust Division.

"As the department's litigation team established at trial, Apple executives hoped to ensure that its e-book business would be free from retail price competition, causing consumers throughout the country to pay higher prices for many e-books. The evidence showed that the prices of the conspiring publishers' e-books increased by an average of 18 percent as a result of the collusive effort led by Apple."

The court has not yet scheduled a hearing to address the parties' proposed remedies.


Previous
Next
Acer Introduces New Gaming Desktop        All News        New Enterprise Hard Disk Drives By Seagate
Instagram Introduces Web Embeds Tools For Embedding Images     General Computing News      Amazon, Sony, Nvidia Among Samsung's Future Chip Clients

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
Apple Granted Patent for Smartwatch
iTunes Festival Returns to London
Europe Says Apple Should Do More To Protect Users From In-app Purchases Problem
iPhone 6 Production Started in July: reports
Apple and Samsung Dominate Smartphones Sales
Apple and IBM Partner On Enterprise Mobility
Apple May Delay The Release Of 5.5-inch iPhone 6
China Claims iPhone Threatens Country's Security
Apple May Release All-Glass iPhone
Apple Admits It Has To Address Production Partners' Emissions
Court Says Apple Store Layout Could Be Trademarked
Chinese Court Upholds Apple IP Case

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2014 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .