Friday, July 31, 2015
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
Researchers Showcase Javascript-based Attack On a Computer's DRAM
Hackers Used Twitter hashtags To Extract Data From Compromised Networks
Facebook Unveils New Security Checkup Tool
Court of Appeals Rejects Google's Move To Overturn Microsoft's Patent Royalty Victory
Toshiba Expands Lineup of Phase Detection Auto-Focus-equipped CMOS Image Sensors for Smartphones
Sony Profit Rises Following Demand For Mobile Cameras
Facebook Profit Fell In 2Q
Galaxy S6 Sales Not Enough To Keep Samsung's Profit High
Active Discussions
How to back up a PS2 DL game
Copy a protected DVD?
roxio issues with xp pro
How to burn a backup copy of The Frozen Throne
Help make DVDInfoPro better with dvdinfomantis!!!
Copied dvd's say blank in computer only
menu making
Optiarc AD-7260S review
 Home > News > General Computing > Judge R...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Judge Rejects Samsung's Demand For New Trial, Apple's Patent Award Demands


A court in California on Tuesday denied Samsung a retrial in a patent infringement dispute with Apple, and also declined to raise the damages earlier awarded to Apple.

The court also granted judgment as matter of law that Samsung's patent infringement was not willful - a finding that could have formed the basis to triple the damages owed by Samsung.

Last August, a jury decided that that the Samsung must pay Apple US$1.05 billion for infringing design and utility patents in Samsung smartphones and tablets.

Samsung asked for a new trial of the case, alleging that the foreman of the jury was untruthful and biased.

On Tuesday, Judge Lucy H. Koh of U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose division, said the jury "had ample opportunity to compensate Apple for Samsung's use of its product designs." The jury awarded $382 million in damages for six products found to have diluted Apple's trade dress patents, but Apple filed for an additional $400 million. "Apple had not clearly shown that it was not adequately compensated for the losses it suffered due to Samsung's dilution of its trade dress in its products," Judge Koh wrote.

The Judge also denied Samsung's motion for judgement that none of Samsung's accused phones infringed Apple's design patents, and also denied Samsung's motion in the for a new trial.

The court also ruled against Samsung's claim that some Apple patents in the suit were invalid for indefiniteness, while granting an Apple plea that claims of a Samsung patent were invalid.


Previous
Next
Smaller Apple TV In The Works        All News        Nintendo Wii U Fails To Boost The Company's Profits
Sony's Music Unlimited Service To Offer High-Quality Audio     General Computing News      LG Reports Revenue Decrease, Operating Profits For 2012

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
Galaxy S6 Sales Not Enough To Keep Samsung's Profit High
Samsung Starts Mass Production Of First Mobile Image Sensor with 1.0µm Pixels
Samsung To Showcase New Galaxy Phablet on August 13 Event
Apple Watch Coming To Best Buy stores
Smartphone Market Posts Year-Over-Year Growth in Q2 2015
Apple Reports Strong iPhone Sales, Watch Sales Still Unknown
Apple App Store, Apple Music Services Partially Down (Updated)
Apple Dominates The Market Of Wearable Bands: Canalys
Samsung Unveils New Data Center Solid State Drives
New Galaxy J2 Coming In S. Korea
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 Tablet Coming Next Month
New Apple iPod Touch Has A Faster Processor, Better Cameras

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2015 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .