Friday, March 31, 2017
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
JEDEC Develops Faster DDR5 SDRAM And NVDIMM-P Standards
Fair Play Pay Act Re-introduced
Optimizations Promise Up to 30 Percent Performance Uplift in Ashes of the Singularity DirectX 12 Benchmark With AMD Ryzen
SpaceX To Launch First Reused Rocket
A Look At Samsung S8's Biometric Technologies
Semiconductor Market Showed Recovery Signs In 2016
Toshiba Investors Approve Memory Chip Sale
Micron's 1xnm DRAM Process Has Low Yields, Says Report
Active Discussions
Which of these DVD media are the best, most durable?
How to back up a PS2 DL game
Copy a protected DVD?
roxio issues with xp pro
Help make DVDInfoPro better with dvdinfomantis!!!
menu making
Optiarc AD-7260S review
cdrw trouble
 Home > News > General Computing > Judge R...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Judge Rejects Samsung's Demand For New Trial, Apple's Patent Award Demands


A court in California on Tuesday denied Samsung a retrial in a patent infringement dispute with Apple, and also declined to raise the damages earlier awarded to Apple.

The court also granted judgment as matter of law that Samsung's patent infringement was not willful - a finding that could have formed the basis to triple the damages owed by Samsung.

Last August, a jury decided that that the Samsung must pay Apple US$1.05 billion for infringing design and utility patents in Samsung smartphones and tablets.

Samsung asked for a new trial of the case, alleging that the foreman of the jury was untruthful and biased.

On Tuesday, Judge Lucy H. Koh of U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose division, said the jury "had ample opportunity to compensate Apple for Samsung's use of its product designs." The jury awarded $382 million in damages for six products found to have diluted Apple's trade dress patents, but Apple filed for an additional $400 million. "Apple had not clearly shown that it was not adequately compensated for the losses it suffered due to Samsung's dilution of its trade dress in its products," Judge Koh wrote.

The Judge also denied Samsung's motion for judgement that none of Samsung's accused phones infringed Apple's design patents, and also denied Samsung's motion in the for a new trial.

The court also ruled against Samsung's claim that some Apple patents in the suit were invalid for indefiniteness, while granting an Apple plea that claims of a Samsung patent were invalid.


Previous
Next
Smaller Apple TV In The Works        All News        Nintendo Wii U Fails To Boost The Company's Profits
Sony's Music Unlimited Service To Offer High-Quality Audio     General Computing News      LG Reports Revenue Decrease, Operating Profits For 2012

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
A Look At Samsung S8's Biometric Technologies
Samsung Galaxy S8 and S8+ Are Official, Along With Bixby And New Gear 360
Samsung To Sell Refurbished Galaxy Note 7s
TSMC To Start Producing A11 InFo Chips For New iPhone In April
Apple Wins Design Patent Case In China
Samsung Backs Away From Restructuring Plan, Gears Up For Galaxy S8 Release
Samsung Plans To Release New Curved TVs
Samsung Adds 4G LTE Capability to Gear S3 Classic
Samsung and eSilicon Taped Out First 14nm Network Processor
Apple's iPhone 6s Topped List of Best-Selling Smartphones for 2016
Samsung Display Is Ramping Up Production To OLEDs For Tablets
Qualcomm Forced Samsung To Use Exynos SoCs Only In Galaxy Phones

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2017 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .