Wednesday, September 28, 2016
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
Europol Says Ransomware Is A Top Cybercrime Threat
New Amazon Fire TV Stick Comes With Alexa Voice Remote
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600E and 410E For Embedded Applications Now Available Through Arrow Electronics
NVIDIA Launches New AI Technology At Third Regional GPU Tech Conference
Blackberry Offifially Stops Making Smartphones, Outsources Mobile Business To Indonesian BB Merah Putih
SpaceX Chief Envisions Ships Flying to City On Mars
New Macbook Air, Macbook Pro 2016 Comig Next Month
Samsung Pay Adds Support for Coupons and Restore Function
Active Discussions
Which of these DVD media are the best, most durable?
How to back up a PS2 DL game
Copy a protected DVD?
roxio issues with xp pro
Help make DVDInfoPro better with dvdinfomantis!!!
menu making
Optiarc AD-7260S review
cdrw trouble
 Home > News > General Computing > Judge R...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Judge Rejects Samsung's Demand For New Trial, Apple's Patent Award Demands


A court in California on Tuesday denied Samsung a retrial in a patent infringement dispute with Apple, and also declined to raise the damages earlier awarded to Apple.

The court also granted judgment as matter of law that Samsung's patent infringement was not willful - a finding that could have formed the basis to triple the damages owed by Samsung.

Last August, a jury decided that that the Samsung must pay Apple US$1.05 billion for infringing design and utility patents in Samsung smartphones and tablets.

Samsung asked for a new trial of the case, alleging that the foreman of the jury was untruthful and biased.

On Tuesday, Judge Lucy H. Koh of U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose division, said the jury "had ample opportunity to compensate Apple for Samsung's use of its product designs." The jury awarded $382 million in damages for six products found to have diluted Apple's trade dress patents, but Apple filed for an additional $400 million. "Apple had not clearly shown that it was not adequately compensated for the losses it suffered due to Samsung's dilution of its trade dress in its products," Judge Koh wrote.

The Judge also denied Samsung's motion for judgement that none of Samsung's accused phones infringed Apple's design patents, and also denied Samsung's motion in the for a new trial.

The court also ruled against Samsung's claim that some Apple patents in the suit were invalid for indefiniteness, while granting an Apple plea that claims of a Samsung patent were invalid.


Previous
Next
Smaller Apple TV In The Works        All News        Nintendo Wii U Fails To Boost The Company's Profits
Sony's Music Unlimited Service To Offer High-Quality Audio     General Computing News      LG Reports Revenue Decrease, Operating Profits For 2012

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
New Macbook Air, Macbook Pro 2016 Comig Next Month
Samsung Pay Adds Support for Coupons and Restore Function
Samsung Says Global Replacement Program for Galaxy Note7 Has Made Progress
Apple Develops Amazon Echo-Style Device
McLaren CEO Says There Are No Discussions With Apple
macOS Sierra Now Available As An Update
Samsung Says Battery Not Related To Note 7 Fire Reports in China
Samsung Narrows Gap With Intel In Semiconductor Industry Ranking
How to Identify the New Galaxy Note7
Samsung Sells Stakes in ASML, Seagate, Rambus and Sharp
Apple Unit Ordered To Pay 12bn Yen Bill For Unpaid Taxes
Samsung's Recall For The Galaxy Note 7 Smartphones In Official In The U.S.

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2016 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .