Sunday, November 19, 2017
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
Verizon Signs Deal with NFL: report
Microsoft Offers Discounted Games for Xbox Live Gold Members, Sony Unveils PlayStation Deals
Apple HomePod Smart Speaker Won't Be an Option For Holiday Shopping
G.Skill Unveils Trident Z DDR4-4400 32GB CL19 Kit
Spotify Buys Soundtrap
Volkswagen to Invest Over $40 billion on Future Cars
Broadcom Completes Acquisition of Brocade
Tesla Roadster Electric Supercar Accelerates to 60mph in 2.2 sec
Active Discussions
Which of these DVD media are the best, most durable?
How to back up a PS2 DL game
Copy a protected DVD?
roxio issues with xp pro
Help make DVDInfoPro better with dvdinfomantis!!!
menu making
Optiarc AD-7260S review
cdrw trouble
 Home > News > General Computing > Judge R...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Judge Rejects Samsung's Demand For New Trial, Apple's Patent Award Demands


A court in California on Tuesday denied Samsung a retrial in a patent infringement dispute with Apple, and also declined to raise the damages earlier awarded to Apple.

The court also granted judgment as matter of law that Samsung's patent infringement was not willful - a finding that could have formed the basis to triple the damages owed by Samsung.

Last August, a jury decided that that the Samsung must pay Apple US$1.05 billion for infringing design and utility patents in Samsung smartphones and tablets.

Samsung asked for a new trial of the case, alleging that the foreman of the jury was untruthful and biased.

On Tuesday, Judge Lucy H. Koh of U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose division, said the jury "had ample opportunity to compensate Apple for Samsung's use of its product designs." The jury awarded $382 million in damages for six products found to have diluted Apple's trade dress patents, but Apple filed for an additional $400 million. "Apple had not clearly shown that it was not adequately compensated for the losses it suffered due to Samsung's dilution of its trade dress in its products," Judge Koh wrote.

The Judge also denied Samsung's motion for judgement that none of Samsung's accused phones infringed Apple's design patents, and also denied Samsung's motion in the for a new trial.

The court also ruled against Samsung's claim that some Apple patents in the suit were invalid for indefiniteness, while granting an Apple plea that claims of a Samsung patent were invalid.


Previous
Next
Smaller Apple TV In The Works        All News        Nintendo Wii U Fails To Boost The Company's Profits
Sony's Music Unlimited Service To Offer High-Quality Audio     General Computing News      LG Reports Revenue Decrease, Operating Profits For 2012

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
Samsung, SK Hynix and Micron Lead the Server DRAM Market
Samsung Invests More Than Intel and TSMC in Semiconductor Business
U.S. Trade Commission Investigating Apple
Apple Retakes the Lead in the Wearable Band Market in Q3 2017
Next AR-focused iPhone Could Have Rear-Facing 3-D Sensor
Apple's Clips introduces Selfie Scenes for 360-degree selfies on iPhone X
Samsung Lithium-air Battery Has Twice The Capacity of Li-ion Technology
Apple Defends its Tax Payment Policy
Supreme Court Rejects Samsung Appeal in Apple Patent Case
ITC Launches Probe into Samsung's Chipmaking Patent
Apple Expects Strong IPhone X Holiday Sales
Qualcomm Files New Lawsuit Against Apple

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2017 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .