Tuesday, January 27, 2015
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
Microsoft Updates Xbox One Controller Firmware
Crucial Ballistix Elite DDR4 Memory Now Available
Samsung Advances Smart eMBMS Solution with Improved Video
Mitsubishi Chemical Files Patent Lawsuit Against Red Phosphors in China
New Vivaldi Browser Aims At Tech Savvy Users
Acer Liquid Z200 Smartphones Debut in Japan
Huawei To Boost Smartphone Shipments
Internet Problems Temporarily Took Down Facebook, Instagram
Active Discussions
Rimage 2000i
Sound card for my Laptop
full screen wide screen
Hi
About the restriction problem of chapter quantity in DVD
Booktype utilities for LiteON and OEM DVD Recorders
downgrade a nero vision 5 project to nero vision 2
what is the minimum burning speed
 Home > News > General Computing > Proview...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Proview Taiwan Charges Apple with Fraud and Unfair Competition


Taiwan-based Proview Electronics says it is now seeking to regain worldwide rights to the iPad name and is suing Apple for alleged fraud and unfair competition, hoping to have a 2009 sale of the trademark ruled void.

The company has filed an amended complaint in California Superior Court in Santa Clara, accusing Apple of fraud and unfair competition.

Separately, in another action, Shenzhen-based Proview Technology Shenzhen Co, Ltd. continues to pursue litigation against Apple in China. In to the Chinese lawsuit, Proview Technology Shenzhen Co, Ltd. has demonstrated that the IPAD trademark for Mainland China was never assigned to Apple or its affiliates.

The legal questions and remedies in the China and U.S. lawsuits are separate and distinct and have no bearing on one another.

The amended complaint was filed to provide additional information regarding Apple's "fraudulent" actions committed against Proview.

"Among the many allegations in the U.S complaint are fraud by intentional misrepresentation, fraud by concealment, fraudulent inducement, and unfair competition," Proview Electronics says.

According to Proview, the December 23, 2009 agreement that Proview Taiwan entered with Apple was "fraudulently induced by the concealment and suppression of material facts by Apple's agents, and that, as a result, the 2009 agreement is void." "Once the agreement is voided for fraud, the iPad trademarks in the European Union, South Korea, Mexico, Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam will revert back to Proview Taiwan," the company says.

Proview contends Apple intentionally misled it when it bought iPad trademarks through a special purpose company called IP Application Development Ltd. that concealed it was acting on Apple's behalf.

"Apple used an intermediary, Farncombe International and its Managing Director, Graham Robinson, to create an elaborate but false pretext for the purchase of Proview's IPAD trademarks. Apple created a special purpose company named IP Application Development Limited ("IPAD Ltd."), then concealed the fact that this company was acting as an agent of Apple. Graham Robinson further concealed Apple's involvement by adopting a false alias, Jonathan Hargreaves, which he used when negotiating with Proview," the Taiwan -based company added.

"While some technology companies create special purpose vehicles in order to obtain trademarks, in this case the sole function of Apple's special purpose vehicle was intentional misrepresentation, and an effort to fraudulently induce Proview Taiwan into a sale of the IPAD trademarks," said Cal Kenney, Spokesman of Proview Taiwan.

"Proview Taiwan had concerns about the purchaser's intentions, and was very diligent in trying to understand the facts surrounding its interest in Proview Taiwan's IPAD trademarks. But even careful diligence is ineffective when the counterparty is engaging in intentional fraud," said Cal Kenney.

The relief Proview Taiwan seeks from Apple includes compensatory damages and disgorgement of Apple's profits from the unfair competition, as well as an injunction to stop Apple's continued use of the fraudulently-obtained trademarks.

"Apple obtained the iPad trademark by defrauding Proview Taiwan through tactics that involved explicit misrepresentations, and the use of foreign entities specifically created to perpetrate the fraud," said Cal Kenney. "By filing the complaint in the California Superior Court, Proview Taiwan seeks the truth about who at Apple orchestrated the fraud, and the specifics of how it was implemented. Proview Taiwan believes that when the truth is exposed, the full weight of Apple's fraudulent and nefarious behavior will be revealed and the appropriate remedies will be obtained."


Previous
Next
Intel, Micron Expand NAND Flash Memory Joint Venture        All News        Sony Introduces New Lineup Of Cyber-shot Cameras
Intel, Micron Expand NAND Flash Memory Joint Venture     General Computing News      IBM Claims New Breakthrough In Quantum Computing

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
Samsung and Apple Together Consumed 17 Percent of Total Semiconductor Demand in 2014
Samsung Led The Smartphone Market in 2014, TrendForce Reports
Apple May Use Its Own Chips In Future Macs
Apple, Ericsson In Courts Over LTE Patents
Apple, Google To End Lawsuit Over Poaching
Apple May Take On GoPro With Action Cameras
Quanta Accelerates Production Of New 12-inch MacBook Air
Apple Patent Describes Flexible iPhone Concept
Apple Starts Selling Unlocked iPhone 6 and 6 Plus
Apple Sued Over Limited Storage Space
Apple Offers Automated Security Update to Macs
Apple Responds To BBC's Allegations Over Working Conditions In Chinese Factory

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2015 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .