Monday, September 26, 2016
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
Snapchat Introduces 'Spectacles' Camera-equipped Glasses, Changes Company name To Snap
Nvidia GPUs Could Return To Apple Macs
Lenovo Brings Fingerprint Authenticated Payments To Laptops
Report Cites Google, Salesforce Interest For Twitter
Dalian Wanda and Sony Enters Team Up in China Movie Business
Apple Develops Amazon Echo-Style Device
ALD Technology Chosen By Samsung, LG For Flexible OLEDs
TSMC To Use Different Processes And 3D Packages Across Future Design Platforms
Active Discussions
Which of these DVD media are the best, most durable?
How to back up a PS2 DL game
Copy a protected DVD?
roxio issues with xp pro
Help make DVDInfoPro better with dvdinfomantis!!!
menu making
Optiarc AD-7260S review
cdrw trouble
 Home > News > General Computing > Consume...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Monday, May 24, 2010
Consumer Watchdog Says FTC's Google-AdMob Decision Will Hurt Consumers


The Federal Trade Commission's decision allowing the $750 million deal for Google to buy mobile advertising company AdMob is anticompetitive and bad for consumers, Consumer Watchdog said today.

In a statement issued today, the Commission said that although the combination of the two leading mobile advertising networks raised serious antitrust issues, the agency?s concerns ultimately were overshadowed by recent developments in the market, most notably a move by Apple ? the maker of the iPhone ? to launch its own, competing mobile ad network. In addition, a number of firms appear to be developing or acquiring smartphone platforms to better compete against Apple?s iPhone and Google?s Android, and these firms would have a strong incentive to facilitate competition among mobile advertising networks.

"The FTC is allowing the two dominant companies in mobile advertising to combine in a monopolistic juggernaut against the third-place company, owned by Apple," said John M. Simpson. "How this possibly can be construed as promoting competition is incomprehensible. What it demonstrates is Google?s clout in Washington. This week CEO Eric Schmidt said he would vigorously fight any opposition to the $750 million deal and that obviously has translated into pulling his political strings in Washington."

Last week Google's former top global lobbyist, Andrew McLaughlin, now White House Deputy Chief Technology Officer, was reprimanded for inappropriate contact with Google executives. Google's lobbyist tactics were clearly to leverage political input from the White House on issues of concern. In one email produced in response to a Freedom of Information Act request from Consumer Watchdog, a Google lobbyist calls on a member of the National Economic Council "for the FTC to have administration input," although the issue related to privacy, not the AdMob merger.

"Clearly Google is willing to pull in political chits from the White House to influence FTC deliberations. Did the White House attempt to influence the AdMob decision? The public deserves to know," Simpson said. "Hopefully the FTC will take a much more critical look at the WiSpy scandal."

Consumer Watchdog said Google?s dominance of online search with 70 percent or more of the search market is a monopoly that must be probed.

Earlier this month Simpson met with a five-person Justice Department team headed by James Tierney, chief of the DOJ?s Networks and Technology Section in the Antitrust Division to voice Consumer Watchdog?s concern about Google?s monopolistic position in the search market. Tierney asked that the specifics of his team?s questions and their reactions not be characterized. He agreed that it would appropriate to describe the Justice Department as being "in a listening mode" concerning Google and its activities.

"For most Americans indeed, - for most people in the world - Google is the gateway to the Internet," said Simpson. "How it tweaks its search algorithms can ensure a business's success or doom it to failure. Google determines what consumers see and where they go and there is increasing evidence that Google is making decisions that unfairly benefit its own business."

Consumer Watchdog said that much of the problem is caused by Google's secretiveness. "While advocating openness and transparency for everyone else, Google itself is a closed black box to outsiders," Simpson said.


Previous
Next
New Intel Technology to Boost Single-thread Performance in Multi-core Systems        All News        Samsung Wave, First Bada Smartphone Hits The Market
Search More Securely With Encrypted Google Web Search     General Computing News      More Than Half Of Facebook Users Consider Quitting Over Privacy

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
Google Launches its Allo Messaging app
Google to Unveil New Smartphones, Hardware In Oct. 4 Event
Google Announces Trip-Planning App
Japan Could Probe Apple And Google Over Unfair Practices
Google to Buy Apigee for $625 Million
Google to Expand Waze Carpooling In San Francisco
Google Uses Artificial Intelligence To Compress Images
Google Duo App Joins Field of Video Calling
Russia Fines Google $6.75 Million
Alphabet Posts Strong Revenue on Video Market
Updated Google Maps Highlight Areas of Interest
Google Keeps The Lead Pack In Federal Lobbying Expenditures

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2016 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .