Tuesday, July 29, 2014
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
BlackBerry Strengthens Its Mobile Security Portfolio With The Acquisition of Secusmart
IBM, ACS And AT&T Claim Breakthrough In Elastic Cloud-to Cloud Networking
HP Says Internet of Things Devices Are Vulnerable to Attack
China Starts Anti-monopoly Investigation On Microsoft
Apple's MacBook Pros Now Come With Faster processors And More Memory
Rhapsody Now Has 2 million Subscribers
LG Starts Selling Its 105-Inch Curved UHDTV
Motorola Said To Make Google's Next Phablet
Active Discussions
help questions structure DVDR
Made video, won't play back easily
Questions durability monitor LCD
Questions fungus CD/DVD Media, Some expert engineer in optical media can help me?
CD, DVD and Blu-ray burning for Android in development
IBM supercharges Power servers with graphics chips
Werner Vogels: four cloud computing trends for 2014
Video editing software.
 Home > News > PC Parts > Intel Q...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Thursday, November 02, 2006
Intel Quad-core Benchmarks Appear Online


A number of benchmarks for Intel's quad-core 'Kentsfield' processor have hit the Internet today. Intel's latest chip is officially called the Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and is an enthusiast chip aimed at high-end gamers, graphic artists and professionals who run multi-threaded applications.

The Core 2 Extreme QX6700 runs at 2.67 GHz on a 1066 MHz front-side bus and basically combines two Conroe dual-core chips into one package. Each chip has its own 4 MB L2 cache. Intel promises that the Kentsfield will be pin-compatible with the Conroe and most motherboard companies have promised full compatibility, either from the factory or with a BIOS upgrade.

The first benchmarks for the Kentsfield chip indicate that the four processing cores do not always speed up applications, since most applications are not programmed to take advantage of the extra cores (multithreading). For example, the Core 2 Quad chip gives almost the same frames per second as the Core 2 Duo E6700 during a Quake 4 benchmark. On the other hand, Kentsfield shows its teeth when used with 3D rendering tools, video editing tools and some codecs. As a result, since there are not that many optimized applications, Kentsfield processors cannot yet become the ultimate leaders from the performance-per-watt prospective.

So everyone is currently expecting to see more new applications that would benefit from systems on multi-core processors in the next 1-2 years.

Note that both Core 2 Extreme X6800 (top Conroe CPU) and the Core 2 Extreme QX6700 are available at the same price. In a smart move, Intel brings the new quad-core chips early into the market, in order to attract enthusiasts who are toying with the price-versus-performance ratio.

Rival AMD is planning to launch similar designed CPUs in the middle of next year. In the meanwhile, the company is expected to roll out its 4x4 platform that will include two dual-core processors.



Previous
Next
YouTube Comes to Mobile Devices Next Year        All News        Cingular to Launch Cell Phone Music Service
OCZ Adds 850W PSU to the GameXStream Family     PC Parts News      VESA Adds HDCP to DisplayPort Specifications

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
New Intel Solid-State Drive Pro 2500 Series Packs SK Hynix Flash And Brings Trusted Security Features
New Intel Haswell CPUs Released
Intel to $60 Ship Galileo Gen2 Computer Next Month
Intel Reports Second-Quarter Revenue of $13.8 billion
Intel Chipsets To Support PCIe 3.0
Intel To Manufacture Future Panasonic SoCs Using Intel's 14nm Low-Power Process
Intel Details Next-Generation Xeon Phi Processor with Integrated Omni Scale Fabric
Intel Adds Laughter into Mobile Messaging
Intel Offers Customizable Chips For Data Centers
Intel Raises Revenue Expectations Thanks To XP Retirement
Intel Focuses On Energy Efficiency In Semiconductors At VLSI 2014
European Court Upholds Record Fine Imposed On Intel

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2014 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .