Wednesday, April 01, 2015
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
Facebook Introduces Riff And Scrapbook
The White House Targets Cyber Attackers With New Sanctions Program
Uber Files Complaints Against Service Bans
Yahoo Autos Is Launching Today
GoDaddy Enters The Wall Street
Amazon Button for Instant Product Ordering
Sony To Sell Olympus Shares
Tech Industry Enjoys April Fools' Day
Active Discussions
how to copy and move data files to dvd-rw
cdrw trouble
Need serious help!!!!
burning
nvidia 6200 review
Hello
Burning Multimedia in track 0
I'm lazy. Please help.
 Home > News > General Computing > Judge d...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Wednesday, September 27, 2006
Judge dismisses part of AMD case against Intel


A federal judge has dismissed a large portion of Advanced Micro Devices' anti-trust lawsuit against Intel, saying that US law does not cover many of AMD's claims.

The decision by judge Joseph Farnan of the US District Court in Delaware follows several quarters in which AMD, the world's number two maker of chips used in personal computers, had taken business from its larger rival.

Sunnyvale, California-based AMD accused Intel in its 2005 lawsuit of building up a dominant market share for some microprocessors by engaging in anticompetitive conduct, including forcing major customers not to buy AMD products.

Intel, based in Santa Clara, California, countered that AMD was seeking damages mostly for lost sales of German-made, Asian-assembled microprocessors to foreign customers.

It called such damages "a foreign anti-trust injury (if it is one at all) for which the US courts cannot provide relief," according to a 2 May court filing.

Lacked jurisdiction

Farnan accepted this argument, concluding that he lacked jurisdiction over AMD's claims based on conduct and harm that took place outside the US.

"AMD has not demonstrated that the alleged foreign conduct of Intel has direct, substantial and foreseeable effects in the US which gives rise to its claim," Farnan wrote in an 18-page opinion.

At best, he said AMD's allegations described activity that might have had "ripple effects" in the US, but not enough to give rise to an anti-trust claim.

"We're pleased that the judge appears to have agreed with our view of the legal issues and the argument we made," Intel spokesman Chuck Mulloy said. He declined further comment pending a Wednesday conference with the judge.

AMD spokesman Mike Silverman said: "Notwithstanding the judge's ruling today, Intel cannot escape anti-trust scrutiny for its conduct wherever in the world it occurs. As this US litigation is joined by global anti-trust investigations, it is clear that Intel cannot escape the consequences of its illegal monopoly abuses."


Previous
Next
Intel's Relentless Pursuit Of Moore's Law To Bring CIOs Incredible Performance And Lower Costs        All News        Microsoft Sues FairUse4WM Developers
Intel's Relentless Pursuit Of Moore's Law To Bring CIOs Incredible Performance And Lower Costs     General Computing News      Microsoft Sues FairUse4WM Developers

Source Link Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
Intel Releases New Braswell SoCs
Intel in Talks to buy Altera: report
AMD Showcases DirectX 12 Performance in new 3DMark API Overhead Feature Test
Intel Lowers First-quarter Revenue Forecast Amid Slow PC Demand
Intel Introduces New Xeon Processor D-1500 Product Family
Intel Outlines 2015 Gaming News at GDC
AMD Enters The Virtual Reality market With Liquid VR
MWC: Intel Launches New Mobile SoCs, LTE Solution
Intel Introduces New Brand Levels for the Intel Atom Processor
AMD Carrizo Does HEVC, Packs South Bridge Chip
GPU shipments Dropped in Q4, Nvidia Had a Small Gain
Intel's 'Skylake' Chips Coming This Year

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2015 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .