Friday, October 09, 2015
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
Firefox To Switch Away From Plugins
ARCHOS and Sikur Ensure Your Privacy with GranitePhone
Apple Removes Apps From Online Store
PC Shipments Kept Falling In 3Q
Apple Says Battery Tests For iPhone 6s Lineup May Be Misleading
Qualcomm Showcases 24-core Server Chip
AT&T Customers Allowed To Make Calls Over Wi-Fi
Amazon Launches App Developing Platform For IoT
Active Discussions
How to back up a PS2 DL game
Copy a protected DVD?
roxio issues with xp pro
How to burn a backup copy of The Frozen Throne
Help make DVDInfoPro better with dvdinfomantis!!!
Copied dvd's say blank in computer only
menu making
Optiarc AD-7260S review
 Home > News > General Computing > File sh...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Wednesday, March 30, 2005
File sharing goes to the Supreme Court

The US Supreme Court will begin hearings on MGM Studios v Grokster, a dispute that could make peer-to-peer (P2P) software impossible to use.

The case is to decide whether companies that develop P2P software are liable if it is used to share pirated media. MGM lost the original case in 2003 and the appeal at the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals last August.

"For the past century, copyright litigation in this country has been an endlessly repeating cycle," said Michael Page of law firm Keker & Van Nest, counsel for Grokster.

"Time and again, the corporations that control both artistic content and the current method of distributing that content ask the courts to protect them against new and better technologies by banning those technologies.

"Time and again, the courts have refused to extend the copyright monopoly, and have allowed new technologies to develop and mature to the benefit of artists, the public and the very corporations that sought to ban them."

If Grokster, and co-defendant StreamCast Networks, lose the case they will face huge legal action from recording and movie studios, as will other P2P software developers.

The companies would conceivably have to pay a fine for every piece of copyrighted media shared over the P2P networks.

The case hinges on interpretation of the 1984 Betamax case over the video recorder, when the courts ruled that the devices were "capable of substantial non-infringing uses" and stopped any attempts to ban the technology.

Action against P2P networks has attracted fierce protest and this case is no exception. Mark Cuban, the billionaire behind, has pledged in his blog to cover Grokster's legal costs.

"We want our content to get to the customer in the way the customer wants to receive it, when they want to receive it, and at a price that is of value to them," he writes.

"If Grokster loses to MGM in the Supreme Court technological innovation might not die, but it will have such a significant price tag associated with it [that] it will be the domain of the big corporations only."


Online gamer killed for selling virtual weapon        All News        ATI Reports Second Quarter Results
HP names Fiorina successor     General Computing News      Microsoft hopeful of accord with EU on media-free Windows version

Source Link Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
France Proposes Tougher Anti-Piracy Laws
Copyright Alert System Set to Begin in The U.S.
British Music Industry To Block More BitTorrent Sites
CCI To Dealy 'Six-strike' Anti-piracy Campaign Until 2013
U.S. Copyright Surveillance Machine About To Be Switched On
Megaupload To Launch Again next Year
Torque Brings BitTorrent To The Browser
BitTorrent Lauches Paid Version Of µTorrent
New EU Law Precludes ISPs To Be Forced to Monitor P2P Users
BitTorrent Launches μTorrent 3.0
BitTorrent Updated With Personal Content Channels
The Pirate Bay Becomes Research Bay

Most Popular News
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2015 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .