CDRInfo Forum CDRInfo Forum

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

Review of the BTC 1016?   Logged in as: Guest
Viewers: 952 You can click here to see Today's Posts | Most Active Topics | Posts Since Last Visit
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [In-House] >> Users FeedBack >> Review of the BTC 1016? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Review of the BTC 1016? - 12/27/2004 7:39:16 PM   
Scour1

 

Posts: 153
Joined: 5/7/2004
Status: offline
Hello!

How are the chance that you get this drive for a review :) ?
Post #: 1
[Deleted] - 12/28/2004 6:47:09 AM   
Deleted User
[Deleted by Admins]

(in reply to Scour1)
  Post #: 2
RE: Review of the BTC 1016? - 12/28/2004 7:25:59 AM   
Scour1

 

Posts: 153
Joined: 5/7/2004
Status: offline
I hope it will happen soon ;)

Do you have first impressions for this drive?

(in reply to Deleted User)
Post #: 3
[Deleted] - 12/28/2004 11:54:45 AM   
Deleted User
[Deleted by Admins]

(in reply to Scour1)
  Post #: 4
RE: Review of the BTC 1016? - 12/29/2004 8:29:42 AM   
Scour1

 

Posts: 153
Joined: 5/7/2004
Status: offline
Oh, i see it. There are 10 FW´s for this new burner

(in reply to Deleted User)
Post #: 5
RE: Review of the BTC 1016? - 12/29/2004 10:59:14 AM   
Iggy


Posts: 3381
Joined: 7/22/2004
From: Jupiter
Status: offline
Yeah, I also noticed that.

I had a BTC for a while in past. Not too bad.

(in reply to Scour1)
Post #: 6
RE: Review of the BTC 1016? - 12/29/2004 11:53:34 AM   
Scour1

 

Posts: 153
Joined: 5/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Iggy

Yeah, I also noticed that.

I had a BTC for a while in past. Not too bad.


Which one?

(in reply to Iggy)
Post #: 7
RE: Review of the BTC 1016? - 12/29/2004 3:07:22 PM   
Iggy


Posts: 3381
Joined: 7/22/2004
From: Jupiter
Status: offline
1108

But to be ownest until some firmware which I cannot remember, it was good. Latetly, not too much offcourse, this changed so I gave it to friend for a Philips.

(in reply to Scour1)
Post #: 8
RE: Review of the BTC 1016? - 12/29/2004 7:39:59 PM   
Scour1

 

Posts: 153
Joined: 5/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Iggy

1108

But to be ownest until some firmware which I cannot remember, it was good. Latetly, not too much offcourse, this changed so I gave it to friend for a Philips.


If I get it right, the early FW´s were better than the newer ones?

(in reply to Iggy)
Post #: 9
RE: Review of the BTC 1016? - 12/30/2004 3:34:16 AM   
fernandes


Posts: 131
Joined: 10/6/2004
From: there
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Scour1

quote:

ORIGINAL: Iggy

1108

But to be ownest until some firmware which I cannot remember, it was good. Latetly, not too much offcourse, this changed so I gave it to friend for a Philips.


If I get it right, the early FW´s were better than the newer ones?


That's what he means, but if I had a word to say about the 1016.... I would say that it's too
unstable with all that firmware upgrades(downgrades)most of the time....
It should've been tested more thoroughly before entering the market...
conclusion?I'm stuck with it and all it's "firmware upgrades"

(in reply to Scour1)
Post #: 10
RE: Review of the BTC 1016? - 12/30/2004 8:29:58 AM   
Iggy


Posts: 3381
Joined: 7/22/2004
From: Jupiter
Status: offline
In my short experience something like that.

(in reply to Scour1)
Post #: 11
RE: Review of the BTC 1016? - 1/22/2005 10:53:46 PM   
digitaldoc


Posts: 259
Joined: 6/1/2004
Status: offline
I must say that my BTC 1008 is disappointing. They haven't released a firmware upgrade in 6 months at this point. I don't expect anything so great out of BTC 1016 or any thing else. I think there are better choices out there.


_____________________________

TNL
LiteOn 1693S review
Plextor 740A review
BTC DVDRW 1008
LiteOn 852S


(in reply to Iggy)
Post #: 12
RE: Review of the BTC 1016? - 1/23/2005 3:29:55 AM   
emperor


Posts: 7210
Joined: 4/28/2004
Status: offline
We had many problems with BTC 1016, already the first drive returned back with serious damage, the second drive, even works, its writing quality is very bad, we already have wasted too many media (Especially DL) so i don't know if and when a review would published

(in reply to digitaldoc)
Post #: 13
RE: Review of the BTC 1016? - 1/23/2005 4:34:00 PM   
digitaldoc


Posts: 259
Joined: 6/1/2004
Status: offline
I think that BTC keeps releasing drives with the latest specs, but they have yet to produce one drive with a mature firmware, and high writing quality. This guarantees they will always be 2nd or more like 3rd tier. A shame in the end, I thought they had potential to be the new LiteOn.


_____________________________

TNL
LiteOn 1693S review
Plextor 740A review
BTC DVDRW 1008
LiteOn 852S


(in reply to emperor)
Post #: 14
RE: Review of the BTC 1016? - 1/23/2005 5:00:01 PM   
Scour1

 

Posts: 153
Joined: 5/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: digitaldoc

I think that BTC keeps releasing drives with the latest specs, but they have yet to produce one drive with a mature firmware, and high writing quality. This guarantees they will always be 2nd or more like 3rd tier. A shame in the end, I thought they had potential to be the new LiteOn.


It is a new LiteOn, look at the bad writing quality

(in reply to digitaldoc)
Post #: 15
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [In-House] >> Users FeedBack >> Review of the BTC 1016? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.094