CDRInfo Forum CDRInfo Forum

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

Is overclocking dead?   Logged in as: Guest
Viewers: 923 You can click here to see Today's Posts | Most Active Topics | Posts Since Last Visit
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [News Around The Web] >> General Computing News >> Is overclocking dead? Page: [1]
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Is overclocking dead? - 11/4/2009 7:49:04 AM   


Posts: 462
Joined: 4/1/2009
Status: offline
Last month Intel finally got round to releasing a CPU based on its Nehalem core for under £150.

Universally applauded, it delivers exceptional performance out of the box for everything you use a desktop for.  Given the right circumstances, it can intelligently increase its own clockspeed from 2.66GHz to 3.2GHz, thanks to Intel's Turbo Boost technology.

It's hard to fault, but for PC enthusiasts and hardware hackers, it raises a rather existential question about the future.  What's the point in spending a fortune on liquid coolers and risking BIOS death for a few extra MHz on the clockspeed any more?  Has the Core i5 killed off overclocking for good?

Necessity may not have been the mother of overclocking's invention, but it certainly helped to popularise it.  Back in the dark ages of computing, about 15 years ago, there was no such thing as a CPU that supplied 'enough' processing power.

Even the highest spec'd chips would occasionally struggle with running Word, and they were priced at around two years' worth of student grant or an annual mortgage payment.

  MSI's P55 motherboards include an automated overclocking tool that claims to be better than Intel's on-die version

From some point in the mid-90s onward, people who could barely wave a screwdriver without poking an eye out began moving jumpers, breaking pins and jury rigging their motherboard sockets with everything from wires through putty to pencils in order to eke out enough power to run fancy new games like Tomb Raider without resorting to buying a PlayStation.

Nowadays, only specialised apps like video encoding really require faster processors, and with Windows 7 it's easier to utilise the latent power of your graphics card to fill in the gap.

Does that mean overclocking is losing its appeal?  There's no reliable statistics for the number of casual PC users who overclock their CPU, but there is some evidence to back up the claim that overclocking has fallen out of favour.

For example, it's a topic which barely ever comes up on the PC Gamer forums.  One reader's comments seem to sum up the feelings of many:  "I see no point in overclocking a CPU that can do everything I throw at it with ease."
More reading:
Post #: 1
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [News Around The Web] >> General Computing News >> Is overclocking dead? Page: [1]
Jump to:

New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI