Is there any reson why this wouldn't work with my computer? I don't know what to say so I'll just post a lot of random info, but I'll be carful not to post any private info, lest I be banned "I'm not mentioning any names"
Operating System: Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2 (build 2600)
Local Drive Volumes: c: (NTFS on drive 0) 160.03 GB 59.31 GB free Controllers: Standard floppy disk controller Primary IDE Channel [Controller] (2x) Secondary IDE Channel [Controller] (2x) Standard Dual Channel PCI IDE Controller VIA Bus Master IDE Controller
Bus Adapters: NERO IMAGEDRIVE SCSI Controller Standard Enhanced PCI to USB Host Controller VIA Rev 5 or later USB Universal Host Controller (4x)
Okay thats enough.... Thanks in advance, James
SithTracy -> RE: Intel Celeron D Processer (3/6/2008 11:36:12 PM)
Hmmm... you have a Core 2 Duo, but want something faster... Pretty darn sure I would not be looking at a Celeron... Perhaps a Quad, but get your check book out.
I am pretty happy with my E6600. May pick up a quad core in a few months, but I am in no rush... I think you should stick with what you got for the time being... but that is just my opinion.
MP3Mogul -> RE: Intel Celeron D Processer (3/7/2008 1:39:12 PM)
The processor you already have is faster than what you are looking at, considering it is a Celeron.
Just as a note, I just read another post that stated you didn't have a floppy drive in your computer, however, the info above states you do!
killalot57 -> RE: Intel Celeron D Processer (3/8/2008 2:42:36 AM)
Faster? **** ******, I wish I read that before I bought it! It's my fault for not checking up enough. to tell you the truth as far as I know, more htz means more speed... I don't even know what celeron means