[Deleted] (Full Version)

All Forums >> [In-House] >> Site News



Message


Deleted User -> [Deleted] (3/22/2005 9:02:25 AM)

[Deleted by Admins]




emperor -> RE: Samsung TS-H552U review>>>> (3/22/2005 5:44:43 PM)

minos thanks for the news!




Marcel17 -> RE: Samsung TS-H552U review>>>> (3/22/2005 7:19:46 PM)

I just brought one of these , y've instaled the drive the day before yesterday, and today, i read this review , i must say yhat i'm scared ,i thout the 552U is just a small revision of 552B.I think y was wrong huh?
Fromm what i've read /heared this drive was supposed to be quieter than the NEC 3250 /Pioneer 109,have the same writing quality as them ,be a little better with the error correction(in my case the ability to read poorely pressed DVD's/Taiwanese counterfit anime that my Sony reader was chocking on)I did not care abbout speed or bit setting as y do not own a stand alone DVD player.I guess that all that is valid for the "B" not the "U".
This is my first burner,hmm,what am y gonna do,what am y gonna do?




Sen028 -> RE: Samsung TS-H552U review>>>> (3/23/2005 12:13:45 AM)

Just wondering the 5:17min timing for 16x TDK DVD-R is full size? It's a record if it's really 4.38GB. [8D]




Deleted User -> [Deleted] (3/23/2005 6:24:39 AM)

[Deleted by Admins]




Sen028 -> RE: Samsung TS-H552U review>>>> (3/23/2005 9:17:43 AM)

Nice to hear that. [:D] Might get one just for fun, it's dirt cheap here.[:)]




Iggy -> RE: Samsung TS-H552U review>>>> (3/23/2005 10:00:04 AM)

And according to the following page:

http://www.cdrinfo.com/Sections/Reviews/Specific.aspx?ArticleId=12979&PageId=11

the quality is not too bad, don't you think? for 5:17min recording.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
1.660156E-02